POSITIVE SHIFTS OF EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS - A STATE OF CORTICAL DISFACILITATION AS REFLECTED BY THE STARTLE REFLEX PROBE

被引:89
作者
SCHUPP, HT
LUTZENBERGER, W
RAU, H
BIRBAUMER, N
机构
[1] EBERHARD KARLS UNIV TUBINGEN,DEPT MED PSYCHOL & BEHAV NEUROBIOL,D-72074 TUBINGEN,GERMANY
[2] UNIV PADUA,PADUA,ITALY
来源
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY | 1994年 / 90卷 / 02期
关键词
EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL; P300; GO/NOGO TASK; STARTLE REFLEX; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/0013-4694(94)90005-1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Cortical positivity as measured by slow event-related potentials is assumed to represent a decreased excitability of cortical networks and suppression of their behavioral-cognitive output. The blink reflex probe is a commonly used defensive electromyographic response whose amplitude was shown to be modulated by emotional and attentional orientation. It was used here as an indicator of cortico-subcortical excitation. In study 1, 33 healthy subjects took part in a continuous performance test (CPT). Event-related potentials were recorded from 15 standard scalp locations. Acoustic startling noise bursts were delivered during conditions that required either performance of prepared motor responses (Go), inhibition of prepared motor responses (NoGo), or had no motor significance (Irrelevant condition). During the NoGo condition, EEG surface potentials showed a widespread P300-like positivity with a central maximum. Startle responses were inhibited during the NoGo condition as compared to the Irrelevant condition. In study 2 (21 subjects) the same format was used, except that the startle reflex was elicited visually. Startle reflexes again showed smaller magnitude during the NoGo condition, which evoked larger positivity at central sites in comparison to the Irrelevant condition. The relationship between positivity in the EEG and inhibited startle responses is in line with the hypothesis that positive EEG shifts reflect a state of cortical disfacilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 144
页数:10
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   INTERMODAL SELECTIVE ATTENTION .2. EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL LOAD ON PROCESSING OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL-STIMULI IN CENTRAL SPACE [J].
ALHO, K ;
WOODS, DL ;
ALGAZI, A ;
NAATANEN, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 82 (05) :356-368
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]   BLINK REFLEX MODIFICATION BY SELECTIVE ATTENTION - EVIDENCE FOR THE MODULATION OF AUTOMATIC PROCESSING [J].
ANTHONY, BJ ;
GRAHAM, FK .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 21 (01) :43-59
[4]  
ANTHONY BJ, 1985, ADV PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, V1, P167
[5]  
Bauer H., 1984, SELF REGULATION BRAI, P216
[6]   SLOW POTENTIALS OF THE CEREBRAL-CORTEX AND BEHAVIOR [J].
BIRBAUMER, N ;
ELBERT, T ;
CANAVAN, AGM ;
ROCKSTROH, B .
PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1990, 70 (01) :1-41
[7]   BIOFEEDBACK OF EVENT-RELATED SLOW POTENTIALS OF THE BRAIN [J].
BIRBAUMER, N ;
ELBERT, T ;
ROCKSTROH, B ;
LUTZENBERGER, W .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 16 (04) :389-415
[8]   P3, BY-PRODUCT OF A BY-PRODUCT [J].
BIRBAUMER, N ;
ELBERT, T .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :375-377
[9]   MODIFICATION OF THE ACOUSTIC STARTLE REFLEX BY A TACTILE PREPULSE - THE EFFECTS OF STIMULUS ONSET ASYNCHRONY AND PREPULSE INTENSITY [J].
BLUMENTHAL, TD ;
GESCHEIDER, GA .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 24 (03) :320-327
[10]   SPONTANEOUS CORTICAL SLOW-POTENTIAL SHIFTS AND CHOICE REACTION-TIME PERFORMANCE [J].
BORN, J ;
WHIPPLE, SC ;
STAMM, J .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1982, 54 (06) :668-676