THE ROLE OF ATTITUDE OBJECTS IN ATTITUDE FUNCTIONS

被引:288
作者
SHAVITT, S
机构
[1] University of Illinois at Urbana, Champaign
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0022-1031(90)90072-T
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Previous approaches to attitude functions have examined personality and situational influences on the multiple functions that can be served by the same attitudes. The present analysis focuses on the role of attitude objects in attitude functions and proposes that attitudes toward some objects tend to serve a single function. Using newly developed measures of attitude functions, Study 1 established that objects that are primarily associated with a single attitude function (utilitarian, social identity, or self-esteem maintenance function) can be identified. In Study 2, such objects served as a basis for directly varying the functions of attitudes, by varying the types of objects that served as experimental stimuli. This study investigated whether attitudes toward objects that engage different functions respond to different types of persuasive appeals. Subjects read appeals (advertisements) containing function-relevant or function-irrelevant information about products assumed primarily to engage either a utilitarian or a social identity function. Function-relevant ads were more persuasive than function-irrelevant ads, consistent with the findings of previous functional approaches. Additional data identified a situational factor, the juxtaposition of appeals, that influenced the magnitude of these effects. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 148
页数:25
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Abelson R. P., 1982, CONSISTENCY SOCIAL B, V2, P131
[2]  
Cacioppo J.T., 1981, COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT, P309
[3]  
Campbell J., 1983, PSYCHOL PERSPECTIVES, V2, P1
[4]   ATTITUDES AND ATTITUDE-CHANGE [J].
CHAIKEN, S ;
STANGOR, C .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 38 :575-630
[5]   SOURCE EXPERTISE, SOURCE ATTRACTIVENESS, AND THE PROCESSING OF PERSUASIVE INFORMATION - A FUNCTIONAL-APPROACH [J].
DEBONO, KG ;
HARNISH, RJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 55 (04) :541-546
[7]  
Fazio RH, 1989, ATTITUDE STRUCTURE F, P153
[8]  
Fishbein M, 1975, BELIEF ATTITUDE INTE
[10]  
Insko C. A., 1967, THEORIES ATTITUDE CH