COMPARISON OF THE HEMODYNAMIC-RESPONSE TO LARYNGEAL MASK INSERTION AND OROTRACHEAL INTUBATION

被引：13

作者：

HOLLANDE, J ^{[1
]}

RIOU, B ^{[1
]}

GUERRERO, M ^{[1
]}

LANDAULT, C ^{[1
]}

VIARS, P ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV PARIS 06,DEPT ANESTHESIE REANIMAT,47 BLVD HOP,F-75651 PARIS,FRANCE

来源：

ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION | 1993年 / 12卷 / 04期

关键词：

Anesthésie (techniques) : anesthésie générale; Anesthésiques (intraveineux) : propofol; Chirurgie : orthopédique; Hémodynamique : effets hémodynamiques de l'intubation; Intubation : intubation orotrachéale; Masque laryngé;

D O I：

10.1016/S0750-7658(05)80103-0

中图分类号：

R614 [麻醉学];

学科分类号：

100217 ;

摘要：

This prospective study was designed to compare the haemodynamic response to insertion of either a laryngeal mask or an orotracheal tube. Twenty patients scheduled for orthopaedic surgery were randomly assigned to two groups : laryngeal mask group (n = 10) and orotracheal tube group (n = 10). Patients were premedicated with flunitrazepam (1 mg i.m.) and anaesthesia was induced with propofol (bolus of 2.5 mg . kg-1, followed by a continuous infusion of 10 mg . kg-1 . h-1) and vecuronium (0.1 mg . kg-1). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were assessed non-invasively before and after induction of anaesthesia and immediately after tube or laryngeal mask insertion. Orotracheal intubation elicited a significant increase in heart rate (92 +/- 16 vs 77 +/- 19 b . min-1, p < 0.05) and in mean arterial pressure (117 +/- 21 vs 85 +/- 16 mmHg, p < 0.05), whereas there was significant increase in heart rate (74 +/- 11 vs 72 +/- 12 b . min-1) and mean arterial pressure (86 +/- 8 vs 81 +/- 10 mmHg) after insertion of the laryngeal mask. In both groups, plasma catecholamine concentrations were not significantly modified after tube or laryngeal mask insertion. It is concluded that, under propofol anaesthesia, laryngeal mask insertion does not induce any significant haemodynamic response in ASA 1 patients. In the opposite, orotracheal intubation increases both heart rate and mean arterial pressure.

引用

页码：372 / 375

页数：4

共 18 条

[1]

Alexander, Leach, Thompson, Lister, Use your Brain, Anaesthesia, 43, pp. 893-894, (1988)

[2]

Alexander, Leach, Incidence of sore throats with the laryngeal mask, Anaesthesia, 44, pp. 790-791, (1989)

[3]

Bouguet, Riou, Roux, Atténuation de la réponse hémodynamique à l'intubation trachéale par le multibloc laryngotrachéal en neurochirurgie, Ann Fr Anesth Réanim, 10, (1991)

[4]

Brain, The laryngeal mask. A new concept in airway management, Br J Anaesth, 55, (1983)

[5]

Braude, Clements, Hodges, Andrews, The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion, Anaesthesia, 44, pp. 551-554, (1989)

[6]

Brodick, Webster, Nunn, The laryngeal mask airway. A study of 100 patients during spontaneous breathing, Anaesthesia, 44, pp. 238-241, (1989)

[7]

Bruder, Ortega, Granthil, Conséquences et moyens de prévention des modifications hémodynamiques lors de la laryngoscopie et de l'intubation endotrachéale, Ann Fr Anesth Réanim, 11, pp. 57-71, (1992)

[8]

Fox, Sklar, Hill, Villanueva, King, Complications related to the pressor response to endotracheal intubation, Anesthesiology, 47, pp. 524-525, (1977)

[9]

Helfman, Gold, Everard, de Lisser, Herrington, Which drug prevents tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal intubation : lidocaine, fentanyl, or esmolol?, Anesth Analg, 72, pp. 482-486, (1991)

[10]

Hickey, Cameron, Asbury, Cardiovascular response to insertion of Brain's laryngeal mask, Anaesthesia, 45, pp. 629-633, (1990)

← 1 2 →