ASSESSMENT FOR AUTOMATIC SPEECH RECOGNITION .1. COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENT METHODS

被引：10

作者：

STEENEKEN, HJM ^{[1
]}

VARGA, A ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] DRA, SPEECH RES UNIT, MALVERN WR14 3PS, WORCS, ENGLAND

来源：

SPEECH COMMUNICATION | 1993年 / 12卷 / 03期

关键词：

SPEECH RECOGNIZER ASSESSMENT; VOCABULARIES; NOISE;

D O I：

10.1016/0167-6393(93)90094-2

中图分类号：

O42 [声学];

学科分类号：

070206 ; 082403 ;

摘要：

The use of three types of vocabularies (cockpit-control words, digits, and initial consonants) was compared for the assessment of five speech recognizers. The goal of this study is to compare various assessment methods from application oriented to carefully controlled laboratory situations. It was found that the discrimination between various recognizer (input) conditions is improved for more difficult vocabularies. Confusions between stimuli and responses of testwords can be used as a diagnostic tool for prediction of performance and developments.

引用

页码：241 / 246

页数：6

共 9 条

[1]

MOORE RK, 1991, P WORKSHOP INT COOPE

[2]

Steeneken H. J. M., 1989, ICASSP-89: 1989 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (IEEE Cat. No.89CH2673-2), P540, DOI 10.1109/ICASSP.1989.266483

[3]

STEENEKEN HJM, 1989, EUROPEAN SPEECH C ES

[4]

STEENEKEN HJM, 1991, P EUROSPEECH 91 GEN, P529

[5]

STEENEKEN HJM, 1991, ESPRIT SAMTNO041 DOC

[6]

STEENEKEN HJM, 1992, THESIS U AMSTERDAM

[7] SPEECH-DISCRIMINATION SCORES MODELED AS A BINOMIAL VARIABLE [J].

THORNTON, AR ;

RAFFIN, MJM .

JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1978, 21 (03) :507-518

[8]

VANVELDEN JG, 1992, IZF A26 I PERC REP

[9]

VARGA AP, 1992, NOISEX92 STUDY EFFEC

← 1 →