QUALITATIVE MULTICRITERIA METHODS FOR FUZZY-EVALUATION PROBLEMS - AN ILLUSTRATION OF ECONOMIC-ECOLOGICAL EVALUATION

被引:75
作者
MUNDA, G
NIJKAMP, P
RIETVELD, P
机构
[1] FREE UNIV AMSTERDAM, DEPT ECON, DE BOELELAAN 1105, 1081 HV AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS
[2] COMMISS EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, JOINT RES CTR, INST SYST ENGN & INFORMAT, I-21020 ISPRA, ITALY
关键词
FUZZY SETS; MULTICRITERIA METHODS; MIXED INFORMATION; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1016/0377-2217(93)E0250-2
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
It is nowadays increasingly realised that environmental and resource problems generally have complicated economic and ecological dimensions. Therefore, there is a clear need for models offering a comprehensible and operational representation of a real-world environmental system. A great variety of quantitative (descriptive and forecasting) models has been developed for compound environmental systems, but there is still a need in a planning context for evaluation methods taking into account information of a mixed (qualitative and quantitative) type. This paper presents a new discrete multicriteria evaluation model whose impact (or evaluation) matrix may include either crisp, stochastic or fuzzy measurements of the performance of an alternative a(n) with respect to a criterion g(m). No traditional weighting of criteria is used in this method. From an empirical point of view, this model is particularly suitable for economic-ecological modelling incorporating various degrees of precision of the variables measured. From a methodological point of view, two main issues will be faced here: (i) the problem of equivalence of the used procedures in order to standardise the various evaluations (of a mixed type) of the performance of alternatives according to different criteria; (ii) the problem of comparison of fuzzy numbers typical of all fuzzy multicriteria methods. An illustrative numerical example will be presented at the end of the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 97
页数:19
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   RATING AND RANKING OF MULTIPLE-ASPECT ALTERNATIVES USING FUZZY SETS [J].
BAAS, SM ;
KWAKERNAAK, H .
AUTOMATICA, 1977, 13 (01) :47-58
[2]  
Baldwin J. F., 1979, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V2, P213, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(79)90028-9
[3]  
BELLMAN RE, 1970, MANAGE SCI B-APPL, V17, pB141
[4]  
Bezdek J. C., 1979, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V2, P5, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(79)90011-3
[5]  
Bezdek J. C., 1978, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V1, P255, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90017-9
[6]  
Bonissone P. P., 1982, P 12 C WINT SIM ORL, P329
[7]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[8]  
Braat LC, 1987, EC ECOLOGICAL MODELI
[9]   HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS - THE PROMETHEE METHOD [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, P ;
MARESCHAL, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 24 (02) :228-238
[10]   FUZZY SETS AND DECISION THEORY [J].
CAPOCELLI, RM ;
DELUCA, A .
INFORMATION AND CONTROL, 1973, 23 (05) :446-473