CLINICAL VALIDATION OF FUNCTIONAL FLEXION EXTENSION ROENTGENOGRAMS OF THE LUMBAR SPINE

被引:106
作者
DVORAK, J
PANJABI, MM
NOVOTNY, JE
CHANG, DG
GROB, D
机构
[1] Department of Neurologyand and Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Unit, Wilhelm Schulthess Hospital, Zurich
[2] Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
关键词
LUMBAR SPINE; FUNCTIONAL FLEXION EXTENSION ROENTGENOGRAMS; LOW-BACK PAIN; HYPERMOBILITY; HYPOMOBILITY;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199108000-00014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical validity of functional flexion-extension roentgenograms of the lumbar spine in a defined patient population. One hundred and one adults with low-back pain or functional disorders underwent passive functional flexion-extension examinations. Their roentgenograms were analyzed using a computer-assisted method to determine segmental motion parameters such as rotation and translation of the lumbar vertebrae. The patient population was broken down into five groups with similar pathologies or physical conditions, and their motion parameters compared to a normal population and to each other. It was found that all of the patient groups exhibited significantly hypomobile motion, spread equally among all levels, in comparison to the normal population, except for the group of high-performance athletes, who had significant hypermobility. The uniform spread of hypomobility limits the ability to distinguish with any confidence between the four pathologic groups by their motion. Thus, we believe that the analysis of the segmental motion of the lumbar spine using passive flexion-extension roentgenograms does not aid in differentiating the underlying pathologic condition of patients with low-back pain, and that no useful information can be derived form this procedure, especially in relation to the need for surgical intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:943 / 950
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
Begg A.C., Falconer M.A., Plain radiography in intraspinal protrusion of lumbar intervertebral discs: A correlation with operative findings, Br J Surg, 36, pp. 225-239, (1949)
[2]
Dupuis P.R., Yong-Hing K., Cassidy J.D., Kirkaldy-Willis W.H., Radiologic diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability, Spine, 10, pp. 262-276, (1985)
[3]
Dvorflk J., Fohlich D., Penning L., Baumgaertner H., Panjabi M.M., Functional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine: Flexion/extension, Spine, 13, pp. 748-755, (1988)
[4]
Dvofdk J., Panjabi M.M., Chang D.G., Theiler R., Grab D., Functional radiographic diagnosis o f the lumbar spine: Flexion-extension and lateral bending, Spine, 16, pp. 562-571, (1991)
[5]
Friberg O., Lumbar instability: A dynamic approach by traction-compression radiography, Spine, 12, pp. 119-129, (1987)
[6]
Froning E.C., Frohman B., Motion of the lumbosacral spine after laminectomy and spine fusion, J Bone Joint Surg, 50 A, pp. 897-918, (1968)
[7]
Henley E.N., Matteri R.E., Frymoyer J.W., Accurate roentgenographic determination of lumbar flexion-extension, Clinorthop, 115, pp. 145-148, (1976)
[8]
Mensor M., Duvall G., Absence o f motion at the fourth and fifth lumbar interspaces in patients with and without low-back pain, J Bone Joint Surg, 39 B, pp. 6-22, (1959)
[9]
Moll J., Wright V., Normal range of spinal mobility, Ann Rheum Dis, 30, (1971)
[10]
Panjabi M.M., Goel V.K., Walter S.D., Schick S., Errors in the center and angle of rotation of a joint: An experimental study, J Biomech Eng, 104, pp. 232-237, (1982)