FOOD-PAIRED STIMULI AS CONDITIONED REINFORCERS - EFFECTS OF D-AMPHETAMINE

被引:16
作者
COHEN, SL [1 ]
BRANCH, MN [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV FLORIDA,DEPT PSYCHOL,GAINESVILLE,FL 32611
关键词
CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT; D-AMPHETAMINE; BRIEF STIMULUS; 2ND-ORDER SCHEDULES; KEY PECK; PIGEONS;
D O I
10.1901/jeab.1991.56-277
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Seven pigeons were studied in two experiments in which key pecks were reinforced under a second-order schedule wherein satisfaction of variable-interval schedule requirements produced food or a brief stimulus. In the second part of each session, responses produced only the brief stimulus according to a variable-interval schedule (food extinction). For the 4 pigeons in Experiment 1, the response key was red throughout the session. In separate phases, the brief stimulus was either paired with food, not paired with food, or not presented during extinction. d-Amphetamine (0.3 to 10.0 mg/kg) dose-dependently reduced food-maintained responding during the first part of the session and, at intermediate dosages, increased responding during the extinction portion of the session. The magnitude of these increases, however, did not consistently depend on whether the brief stimulus was paired, not paired, or not presented. It was also true that under nondrug conditions, response rates during extinction did not differ reliably depending on pairing operations for the brief stimulus. In Experiment 2, 3 different pigeons responded under a procedure wherein the key was red in the component with food presentations and blue in the extinction component (i.e., multiple schedule). Again, d-amphetamine produced dose-related decreases in responding during the first part of a session and increases in responding in the second part of the session. These increases, however, were related to the pairing operations; larger increases were observed when the brief stimulus was paired with food than when it was not or when it was not presented at all. Under nondrug conditions, the paired brief stimulus controlled higher response rates during extinction than did a nonpaired stimulus or no stimulus. These findings suggest that d-amphetamine can enhance the efficacy of conditioned reinforcers, and that this effect may be more robust if conditioned reinforcers occur in the context of a signaled period of extinction.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 288
页数:12
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Autor S. M, 1969, CONDITIONED REINFORC
[2]  
BARRETT JE, 1981, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V218, P692
[3]   THE ACQUISITION OF RESPONDING WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT - EFFECTS OF COCAINE, (+)-AMPHETAMINE AND PIPRADROL [J].
BENINGER, RJ ;
HANSON, DR ;
PHILLIPS, AG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1981, 74 (01) :149-154
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF PIPRADROL ON THE ACQUISITION OF RESPONDING WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT - A ROLE FOR SENSORY PRECONDITIONING [J].
BENINGER, RJ ;
HANSON, DR ;
PHILLIPS, AG .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 69 (03) :235-242
[5]   THE EFFECT OF PIMOZIDE ON THE ESTABLISHMENT OF CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT [J].
BENINGER, RJ ;
PHILLIPS, AG .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 68 (02) :147-153
[6]  
BOND NW, 1975, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V194, P327
[7]   A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESPONDING MAINTAINED BY INTERVAL SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT [J].
CATANIA, AC ;
REYNOLDS, GS .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1968, 11 (3P2S) :327-+
[8]   FACTORS INFLUENCING RESPONDING UNDER MULTIPLE SCHEDULES OF CONDITIONED AND UNCONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT [J].
COHEN, SL ;
LENTZ, BE .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1976, 26 (03) :395-404
[9]  
Dews PB, 1977, ADV BEHAV PHARMACOL, V1, P167
[10]  
Fantino E., 1977, HDB OPERANT BEHAV, P313