THE ROLE OF WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY AND GENERAL CONTROL PROCESSES IN INTELLIGENCE

被引:80
作者
EMBRETSON, SE
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0160-2896(95)90031-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although both general control processing (i.e., global metacomponents) and working memory capacity have emerged as primary explanations of abstract intelligence, their relative impact on individual differences rarely has been compared. This study examines the impact of general control processing and working memory capacity on an important measuring task for abstract intelligence. A new multicomponent latent trait model (MLTM) for covert responses was applied to item response data for matrix problems. With this model, working memory capacity could be separated from general control processing because item processing requirements for the former varies systematically across items (Carpenter, Just, and Shell, 1990), whereas the latter remains constant. Structural equation modeling indicated that both processing abilities were significant sources of individual differences. However, general control processing had a stronger impact. The results, and their limitations, are discussed in the context of prior theory and research.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 189
页数:21
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Baddeley A. D., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[2]   LEARNING STRATEGIES AS DETERMINANTS OF MEMORY DEFICIENCIES [J].
BELMONT, JM ;
BUTTERFI.EC .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 2 (04) :411-420
[3]  
BELMONT JM, 1982, MUCH CAN INTELLIGENC
[4]  
Brown A. L., 1978, ADV INSTRUCT PSYCHOL, V1
[5]   THE STRUCTURE OF THE MIND A REVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS [J].
Burt, Cyril .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1949, 19 :176-199
[7]  
CARPENTER PA, 1990, PSYCHOL REV, V97
[8]  
CARROLL JB, 1976, NATURE INTELLIGENCE
[9]   MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD FROM INCOMPLETE DATA VIA EM ALGORITHM [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
LAIRD, NM ;
RUBIN, DB .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-METHODOLOGICAL, 1977, 39 (01) :1-38
[10]   A GENERAL LATENT TRAIT MODEL FOR RESPONSE PROCESSES [J].
EMBRETSON, S .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1984, 49 (02) :175-186