SYSTEMATIC RELATIONSHIPS OF THE MANTELLINAE LAURENT 1946 (ANURA-RANOIDEA)

被引:47
作者
BLOMMERSSCHLOSSER, RMA
机构
[1] Institute of Taxonomic Zoology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1009 AT
关键词
ANURA; MICROHYLOIDEA; RANOIDEA; MANTELLINAE; RHACOPHORIDAE; OSTEOLOGY; BEHAVIOR; PHYLOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1080/08927014.1993.9523105
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Different opinions exist about mantelline relationships. Major causes are differences in observations on tarsals and car-pals, and the fact that no consensus has been reached concerning the systematics of the other ranoid frogs, so making it difficult to determine the polarity of character states. Therefore a series of osteological characters was investigated in several ranoids, especially in the Mantellinae, and a cladogram of the ''firmisternal'' frogs was constructed. This cladogram splits into two main branches; the Microhyloidea containing the Sooglossidae, Dendrobatidae, Microhylidae and Hemisotidae (including the Brevicipitinae) and the Ranoidea comprising the Arthroleptidae, Hyperoliidae and Ranidae, including the Mantellinae and Rhacophorinae. With the arthroleptid-hyperoliid lineage as outgroup, the cladogram of the Ranidae shows a stepwise increase of derived features, each step being represented by a subfamily. These features, plus the intercalary element are shared by the monophyletic Mantellinae and Rhacophorinae. Therefore both are regarded as ranid subfamilies. As a result the Ranidae contains the Raninae, Cacosterninae, Nyctibatrachinae (new subfamily), Petropedetinae, Indiraninae (new subfamily), Mantellinae and Rhacophorinae.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 218
页数:20
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Ahl E., Anura III. Polypedatidae, Das Tierreich, 55, pp. 106-477, (1931)
  • [2] Andersen M.L., The comparative myology and osteology of the carpus and tar selected anurans, Ph.D. Thesis, (1978)
  • [3] Arnoult J., Contribution a l'etude des Batraciens de Madagascar. Ecolo developpement de Mantella aurantiaca Mocquard 1900, Bulletin Da Museum Ned'histoire Naturelle, 37, pp. 931-940, (1966)
  • [4] Blommers-Schlosser R., A unique case of mating behaviour in a Malagasy tree-frog, Gephyromantis liber (Peracca, 1893), with observations on the larval development (Amphibia, Ranidae, Beaufortia, 23, pp. 15-25, (1975)
  • [5] Blommers-Schlosser R., Observations on the larval development of some Malagasy frogs, with notes on their ecology and biology (Anura: Dyscophinae, Scaphiophryni-nae and Cophylinae), Beaufortia, 24, pp. 7-26, (1975)
  • [6] Blommers-Schlosser R., Biosystematics of the Malagasy frogs. I. Mantellinae (Ranidae), Beaufortia, 29, pp. 1-77, (1979)
  • [7] Blommers-Schiosser R., Biosystematics of the Malagasy frogs. II. The genus Boo-phis (Rhacophoridae), Bijdrage Tot De Dierkunde, 49, pp. 261-312, (1979)
  • [8] Blommers-Schlosser R., Biosystematics of Malagasy frogs. Een serie artikelen over kikkers voorkomend op het eiland Madagascar, Academisch Proefschrift, Universiteit Van Amsterdam, (1980)
  • [9] Blommers-Schlosser R.M.A., Blanc C.P., Amphibiens (Premiere partie), Paris: Faune De Madagascar, 75, (1991)
  • [10] Bogart J., Tandy P.M., Chromosome lineages in African ranoid frogs, Monitore Zoologico Italiano (Nuova Serie) Supplemento, 15, pp. 55-91, (1981)