PHACOEMULSIFICATION, CAPSULORHEXIS, AND INTRAOCULAR-LENS POWER PREDICTION ACCURACY

被引:22
作者
OLSEN, T
GIMBEL, H
机构
[1] University Eye Clinic, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Aarhus
[2] Gimbel Eye Centre, Calgary, Alberta
关键词
BIOMETRY; CAPSULORHEXIS; CATARACT SURGERY; FORMULA; INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTATION; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POWER; PREDICTION ACCURACY; REFRACTION;
D O I
10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80337-9
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Phacoemulsification with capsulorhexis reduces the surgical variability and may result in a more predictable refractive outcome. To evaluate the prediction accuracy with current lOL power prediction formulas, we reviewed a retrospective series of 628 phacoemulsification cases, including 148 short (<22 mm) and 80 long (>25 mm) eyes. Using the Binkhorst II formula and the manufacturer's recommended anterior chamber depth (ACD) values, the mean absolute refractive prediction error was 0.56 diopters (D). This error could be reduced to 0.51 D by retrospectively optimizing the ACD values for each lens type. Under similar least error conditions, the mean error was 0.51 D with the SRK/T formula and 0.47 D with the Olsen formula (P <.01). The Binkhorst formula overestimated the refraction in short eyes and underestimated the refraction in long eyes. The SRK/T and the Olsen formula were unbiased with the axial length. We hypothesize that the high prediction accuracy may be partially explained by a more predictable pseudophakic ACD with the current surgical technique.
引用
收藏
页码:695 / 699
页数:5
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Nordan LT, Ernest P, Fine IH, Et al., Letter to the editor, Ophthalmology, 98, pp. 1319-1320, (1991)
[2]  
Steinert RF, Brint SF, White SM, Fine IH, Astigmatism after small incision cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized, multicenter comparison of 4- and 6.5-mm incisions, Ophthalmology, 98, pp. 417-424, (1991)
[3]  
Shepherd JR, Induced astigmatism in small incision cataract surgery, J Cataract Refract Surg, 15, pp. 85-88, (1989)
[4]  
Olsen T, Thim K, Corydon L, Accuracy of the newer generation intraocular lens power calculation formulas in long and short eyes, J Cataract Refract Surg, 17, pp. 187-193, (1991)
[5]  
Olsen T, Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation, J Cataract Refract Surg, 18, pp. 125-129, (1992)
[6]  
Gimbel HV, Neuhann T, Development, advantages, and methods of the continuous circular capsulorhexis technique, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 31-37, (1990)
[7]  
Binkhorst RD, Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Manual. A Guide to the Author's TI-58/59 IOL Power Module, (1981)
[8]  
Sanders DR, Retzlaff JA, Kraft' MC, Et al., Comparison of the SRK/T formula and other theoretical and regression formulas, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 341-346, (1990)
[9]  
Olsen T, Thim K, Corydon L, Theoretical versus SRK I and SRK II calculation of intraocular lens power, J Cataract Refract Surg, 16, pp. 217-225, (1990)
[10]  
Olsen T, Prediction of intraocular lens position after intraocular lens implantation, J Cataract Refract Surg, 12, pp. 376-379, (1986)