COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING
被引:1908
作者:
BLAND, JM
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,MED STAT LAB,LONDON WC2,ENGLANDIMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,MED STAT LAB,LONDON WC2,ENGLAND
BLAND, JM
[1
]
ALTMAN, DG
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,MED STAT LAB,LONDON WC2,ENGLANDIMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,MED STAT LAB,LONDON WC2,ENGLAND
ALTMAN, DG
[1
]
机构:
[1] IMPERIAL CANC RES FUND,MED STAT LAB,LONDON WC2,ENGLAND
来源:
LANCET
|
1995年
/
346卷
/
8982期
关键词:
D O I:
10.1016/S0140-6736(95)91748-9
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
When comparing a new method of measurement with a standard method, one of the things we want to know is whether the difference between the measurements by the two methods is related to the magnitude of the measurement. A plot of the difference against the standard measurement is sometimes suggested, but this will always appear to show a relation between difference and magnitude when there is none. A plot of the difference against the average of the standard and new measurements is unlikely to mislead in this way. We show this theoretically and by a practical example.