SHOULDER ABDUCTION STRENGTH MEASUREMENT IN FOOTBALL PLAYERS - RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF 2 FIELD-TESTS

被引:24
作者
BURNHAM, RS
BELL, G
OLENIK, L
REID, DC
机构
[1] UNIV ALBERTA,DEPT PHYS EDUC & SPORT STUDIES,EDMONTON,AB T6G 2H9,CANADA
[2] UNIV ALBERTA,RICK HANSEN CTR,EDMONTON,AB T6G 2H9,CANADA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF SPORT MEDICINE | 1995年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
SHOULDER; BURNER; STRENGTH MEASUREMENT; FOOTBALL;
D O I
10.1097/00042752-199504000-00004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Musculoskeletal and neurologic injuries affecting shoulder strength are common in contact sports, Full-strength recovery is desired before resumption of competition. On-field assessment of shoulder strength is usually done by manual muscle testing, which lacks sensitivity and reliability. Our objective was to determine the reliability and validity of two field instruments capable of quantifying shoulder abduction strength. Twenty junior football players underwent bilateral isokinetic (60 degrees/s) and isometric shoulder abduction strength measurements using a Cybex 340 isokinetic dynamometer. Test-retest measurements of both shoulders of each player were made using strain gauge (SG) and handheld dynamometer (HHD) instruments. Players were tested during rested and competition conditions. Within and between session reliabilities were calculated using the intraclass coefficient, and validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Overall reliability for each device was calculated using Lisrel analysis. SG was found to be superior to HHD in overall reliability and validity. Within-session reliability in the rested and competition states was 0.75 and 0.78, respectively, for SG and 0.60 and 0.81, respectively, for HHD. Between-session reliability in the rested and competition states dropped to 0.51 and 0.63, respectively, for SG and 0.55 and 0.70, respectively, for HHD. Validity was 0.41 and 0.70 for SG when correlated with Cybex at 0 degrees and 60 degrees/s respectively. Validity for HHD was 0.28 and 0.42 for Cybex speeds of 0 degrees and 60 degrees/s, respectively. SG reliability and validity were similar when testing was done one shoulder at a time or both shoulders concurrently. Mean (SD) dominant/nondominant SG ratios were 1.04 (0.11) when the player was rested and 1.09 (0.15) during competition. SG reliability and validity are superior to those of HHD. SG appears to be an acceptable quantitative tool for on-field measurement of shoulder abduction strength in football players.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 94
页数:5
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据