EVALUATION OF CD44 PROGNOSTIC VALUE IN NEUROBLASTOMA - COMPARISON WITH THE OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS

被引:35
作者
COMBARET, V
LASSET, C
FRAPPAZ, D
BOUVIER, R
THIESSE, P
REBILLARD, AC
PHILIP, T
FAVROT, MC
机构
[1] HOP EDOUARD HERRIOT, F-69003 LYON, FRANCE
[2] CTR LEON BERARD, F-69373 LYON 08, FRANCE
关键词
CD44 CELL SURFACE EXPRESSION; IMMUNOSTAINING; NEUROBLASTOMA; PROGNOSTIC FACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/0959-8049(95)00027-G
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
CD44 gene products are potential markers of aggressiveness in different tumour models, a result which prompted us to study clinical neuroblastoma (NB) specimens. CD44 expression was determined by immunostaining of 52 tumour samples from newly diagnosed NE with a monoclonal antibody (J173) directed against an epitope common to all CD44 isoforms. CD44 immunoreactivity was detected in 37 of the tumours (71%). CD44 was expressed in all 22 NBs with favourable prognoses (stages 1, 2 or 4S), but only 50% (15/30) of advanced NE (stages 3 and 4) (P < 10(-4)), suggesting that the absence, rather than the overexpression, of CD44 is a signal of tumour aggressiveness. The cumulative progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients with CD44 positive tumours compared with patients with CD44 negative tumours (P < 10(-5)). More importantly, progression-free survival was also significantly higher in CD44 positive patients within the high-risk group (P < 0.01). In univariate analysis, we tested the prognostic value of tumour expression of CD44 in comparison with tumour stage, age, tumour histology, and presence or absence of amplification of the MYCN protooncogene. All five measures had significant prognostic value. The expression of CD44 and the absence of MYCN amplification were the most powerful predictors of a favourable outcome. In a multivariate analysis of these measures, CD44 expression and tumour stage were the only independent prognostic factors for the prediction of patient survival. NE is the first clinical model described in which tumour aggressiveness correlates with repression rather than stimulation of CD44 expression. We recommend the use of CD44 as an additional biological marker in the initial staging of NB.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 549
页数:5
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   N-MYC DOWN REGULATES NEURAL CELL-ADHESION MOLECULE EXPRESSION IN RAT NEUROBLASTOMA [J].
AKESON, R ;
BERNARDS, R .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, 1990, 10 (05) :2012-2016
[2]   PARTICIPATION IN NORMAL IMMUNE-RESPONSES OF A METASTASIS-INDUCING SPLICE VARIANT OF CD44 [J].
ARCH, R ;
WIRTH, K ;
HOFMANN, M ;
PONTA, H ;
MATZKU, S ;
HERRLICH, P ;
ZOLLER, M .
SCIENCE, 1992, 257 (5070) :682-685
[3]   CD44 IS THE PRINCIPAL CELL-SURFACE RECEPTOR FOR HYALURONATE [J].
ARUFFO, A ;
STAMENKOVIC, I ;
MELNICK, M ;
UNDERHILL, CB ;
SEED, B .
CELL, 1990, 61 (07) :1303-1313
[4]  
BIRCH M, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P6660
[5]  
BOURHIS J, 1991, CANCER RES, V51, P33
[6]   REVISIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRITERIA FOR NEUROBLASTOMA DIAGNOSIS, STAGING, AND RESPONSE TO TREATMENT [J].
BRODEUR, GM ;
PRITCHARD, J ;
BERTHOLD, F ;
CARLSEN, NLT ;
CASTEL, V ;
CASTLEBERRY, RP ;
DEBERNARDI, B ;
EVANS, AE ;
FAVROT, M ;
HEDBORG, F ;
KANEKO, M ;
KEMSHEAD, J ;
LAMPERT, F ;
LEE, REJ ;
LOOK, AT ;
PEARSON, ADJ ;
PHILIP, T ;
ROALD, B ;
SAWADA, T ;
SEEGER, RC ;
TSUCHIDA, Y ;
VOUTE, PA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (08) :1466-1477
[7]  
BRODEUR GM, 1992, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V70, P1685, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19920915)70:4+<1685::AID-CNCR2820701607>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-H
[9]   TUMOR KARYOTYPE DISCRIMINATES BETWEEN GOOD AND BAD PROGNOSTIC OUTCOME IN NEURO-BLASTOMA [J].
CHRISTIANSEN, H ;
LAMPERT, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1988, 57 (01) :121-126
[10]   IMMUNOLOGICAL DETECTION OF NEURO-BLASTOMA CELLS IN BONE-MARROW HARVESTED FOR AUTOLOGOUS TRANSPLANTATION [J].
COMBARET, V ;
FAVROT, MC ;
KREMENS, B ;
PHILIP, I ;
BAILLY, C ;
FONTANIERE, B ;
GENTILHOMME, O ;
CHAUVIN, F ;
ZUCKER, JM ;
BERNARD, JL ;
PHILIP, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 59 (06) :844-847