Controlling Social Dynamics with a Parametrized Model of Floor Regulation

被引:15
作者
Chao, Crystal [1 ]
Thomaz, Andrea L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Interact Comp, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION | 2013年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
Turn-taking; engagement; situated dialogue; floor exchange; backchannel; multimodal systems; timed Petri net; architecture; human-robot interaction;
D O I
10.5898/JHRI.2.1.Chao
中图分类号
TP24 [机器人技术];
学科分类号
080202 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Turn-taking is ubiquitous in human communication, yet turn-taking between humans and robots continues to be stilted and awkward for human users. The goal of our work is to build autonomous robot controllers for successfully engaging in human-like turn-taking interactions. Towards this end, we present CADENCE, a novel computational model and architecture that explicitly reasons about the four components of floor regulation: seizing the floor, yielding the floor, holding the floor, and auditing the owner of the floor. The model is parametrized to enable the robot to achieve a range of social dynamics for the human-robot dyad. In a between-groups experiment with 30 participants, our humanoid robot uses this turn-taking system at two contrasting parametrizations to engage users in autonomous object play interactions. Our results from the study show that: (1) manipulating these turn-taking parameters results in significantly different robot behavior; (2) people perceive the robot's behavioral differences and consequently attribute different personalities to the robot; and (3) changing the robot's personality results in different behavior from the human, manipulating the social dynamics of the dyad. We discuss the implications of this work for various contextual applications as well as the key limitations of the system to be addressed in future work.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 29
页数:26
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Working memory and executive control [J].
Baddeley, A ;
DellaSala, S .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 351 (1346) :1397-1403
[2]   Navigating joint projects with dialogue [J].
Bangerter, A ;
Clark, HH .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2003, 27 (02) :195-225
[3]  
Blumberg B, 2002, ACM T GRAPHIC, V21, P417, DOI 10.1145/566570.566597
[4]  
Bohus D., 2011, P 13 INT C MULT INT, P153, DOI DOI 10.1145/2070481.2070507
[5]   Emotion and sociable humanoid robots [J].
Breazeal, C .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 59 (1-2) :119-155
[6]  
Burgoon J. K., 1995, INTERPERSONAL ADAPTA
[7]   Designing Interactions for Robot Active Learners [J].
Cakmak, Maya ;
Chao, Crystal ;
Thomaz, Andrea L. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTONOMOUS MENTAL DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 2 (02) :108-118
[8]   The power of a nod and a glance:: Envelope vs. emotional feedback in animated conversational agents [J].
Cassell, J ;
Thórisson, KR .
APPLIED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1999, 13 (4-5) :519-538
[9]  
Cassell J, 1999, SPRING COMP SCI, P109
[10]  
Chao C., 2011, 2011 RO-MAN: The 20th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, P235, DOI 10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005239