Is there a demand for multi-year crop insurance?

被引:7
作者
Osipenko, Maria [1 ]
Shen, Zhiwei [2 ]
Odening, Martin [2 ]
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[2] Humboldt Univ, Dept Agr Econ, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Dynamic discrete choice model; Index-based crop insurance; Multi-year insurance;
D O I
10.1108/AFR-12-2014-0043
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the aggregate demand for single-and multi-year crop insurance contracts and to discuss market potential for multi-year crop insurances. Design/methodology/approach - In this paper the authors develop a dynamic discrete choice model of insurance alternatives, in which single-and multi-year insurance contracts are offered to heterogeneous risk averse farmers. The farmers determine their insurances choices based on intertemporal utilities. Findings - The results show that in a competitive insurance market with heterogeneous risk averse farmers, there is simultaneous demand for both insurance contracts. Moreover, the introduction of multi-year contracts enhances the market penetration of insurance products. Research limitations/implications - The effect of introducing multi-year crop insurance is moderate when applying the model to US corn production. In practice, however, the increase of insurance demand could be more pronounced because we did not consider marketing and administrative costs and thus ignore this cost reduction potential of multi-year insurance. Originality/value - This study adds to the literature analyzing the feasibility of multi-year crop insurance and also shows that there is market potential for multi-year crop insurance.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / +
页数:12
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Chen Y.-E., Goodwin B.K., The design of multiyear crop insurance contracts, Selected paper Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting 2010, (2010)
[2]  
Coble K.H., Dismukes R., Thomas S.E., Policy implications of crop yield and revenue variability at differing levels of disaggregation, American Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Annual Meeting, (2007)
[3]  
Deng X., Barnett B.J., Vedenov D.V., Is there a viable market for area-based crop insurance?, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 2, pp. 508-519, (2007)
[4]  
Goodwin B.K., Smith V.H., What harm is done by subsidizing crop insurance?, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95, 2, pp. 489-497, (2013)
[5]  
Kirkwood C., Notes on attitude toward risk taking and the exponential utility function, (1997)
[6]  
Kleindorfer P., Kunreuther H., Ou-Yang C., Single-year and multi-year insurance policies in a competitive market, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 45, 1, pp. 51-78, (2012)
[7]  
Kunreuther H., Michel-Kerjan E., Managing catastrophes through insurance: Challenges and opportunities for reducing future risks, (2009)
[8]  
Mahul O., Optimum area yield crop insurance, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81, 1, pp. 75-82, (1999)
[9]  
Miranda M.J., Area-yield crop insurance reconsidered, American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 2, pp. 233-242, (1991)
[10]  
Norgaard R., Killeen T., Expected utility and the truncated normal distribution, Management Science, 26, 9, pp. 901-909, (1980)