FURTHER INTERCEPTION STUDIES OF HEATHER USING A WET-SURFACE WEIGHING LYSIMETER SYSTEM

被引:19
作者
HALL, RL
机构
[1] Inst of Hydrology, Oxon, Engl, Inst of Hydrology, Oxon, Engl
关键词
BIOMASS - DRAINAGE - LYSIMETERS - RAIN AND RAINFALL - RUNOFF;
D O I
10.1016/0022-1694(85)90176-3
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Measurements have been made of the four canopy parameters required by A. J. Rutter type interception models for heather (Calluna vulgaris). The values obtained are 5. 13 and 0. 00085 for the drainage parameters b and k, respectively, (0. 13 plus or minus 0. 09) for the free throughfall coefficient p, and values of 1. 1 plus or minus 0. 1 and 0. 85 plus or minus 0. 1 mm for the canopy capacity S, derived from independent drainage and evaporation experiments, respectively. It is suggested that the difference between the two values of S is significant and represents a real difference between the canopy storage at which drainage ceases and the smaller canopy storage necessary for a completely wet canopy. Studies of the wetting behavior of heather provide evidence to support this hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 210
页数:18
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
CALDER IR, 1984, J CLIM APPL METEOROL, V23, P461, DOI 10.1175/1520-0450(1984)023<0461:TUOAWS>2.0.CO
[2]  
2
[3]   MODEL OF TRANSPIRATION AND INTERCEPTION LOSS FROM A SPRUCE FOREST IN PLYNLIMON, CENTRAL WALES [J].
CALDER, IR .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1977, 33 (3-4) :247-265
[4]  
CALDER IR, 1980, INTERIM REPORT COLLA
[5]  
CALDER IR, 1985, WATER RESOUR RES
[6]  
CALDER IR, 1982, INTERIM REPORT SCOTT
[7]  
CALDER IR, 1982, P CAN HYDROL S, P173
[8]   ANALYTICAL MODEL OF RAINFALL INTERCEPTION BY FORESTS [J].
GASH, JHC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1979, 105 (443) :43-55
[9]   APPLICATION OF RUTTER MODEL TO ESTIMATION OF INTERCEPTION LOSS FROM THETFORD FOREST [J].
GASH, JHC ;
MORTON, AJ .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1978, 38 (1-2) :49-58
[10]   COMPARATIVE ESTIMATES OF INTERCEPTION LOSS FROM 3 CONIFEROUS FORESTS IN GREAT-BRITAIN [J].
GASH, JHC ;
WRIGHT, IR ;
LLOYD, CR .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1980, 48 (1-2) :89-105