DIFFERENTIAL ZOOPLANKTON FEEDING BEHAVIORS, SELECTIVITIES, AND COMMUNITY IMPACTS OF 2 PLANKTIVOROUS FISHES

被引:36
作者
HAMBRIGHT, KD
HALL, RO
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV,ECOL & SYSTEMAT SECT,ITHACA,NY 14853
[2] CORNELL UNIV,ECOSYST RES CTR,ITHACA,NY 14853
关键词
FILTER-FEEDING; FRESH-WATER PONDS; PARTICULATE-FEEDING; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PREY SELECTION; ZOOPLANKTON COMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00004992
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
We examined the feeding behaviors and selectivities of two common planktivorous fishes, pumpkinseeds Lepomis gibbosa and fathead minnows Pimephales promelas in the laboratory. Ingestion rates for both pumpkinseeds and fathead minnows feeding on zooplankton increased as a function of fish length. Pumpkinseeds fed on zooplankton strictly as particulate feeders, with preferences increasing as a function of zooplankton body size regardless of taxonomic identity. Preferences were highest for large Daphnia, intermediate for intermediate-sized copepods, and lowest for small Ceriodaphnia. Fathead minnows displayed the ability to use both particulate-feeding and filter-feeding behaviors. Differential preferences tended to reflect both zooplankton size and taxon, being highest for large, slow-swimming Daphnia, intermediate for small Ceriodaphnia, and lowest for faster-swimming copepods. These differences in prey capture behaviors and preferences of the two fishes are reflected in the zooplankton taxonomic composition of small ponds containing each fish type. The crustacean zooplankton assemblages in ponds containing both pumpkinseeds and fathead minnows were dominated by copepods. Cladocerans were rare. In ponds containing pumpkinseeds, but no fathead minnows, cladocerans were abundant, generally accounting for up to 80% of total crustacean zooplankton biomass. These results suggest that the type of planktivore, and not simply the presence or abundance of planktivores in a system, can determine zooplankton community structure.
引用
收藏
页码:401 / 411
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Benndorf J., 1988, LIMNOLOGICA BERLIN, V19, P1
[2]  
Carlander K. D., 1977, HDB FRESHWATER FISHE, V2
[3]  
Carlander K. D, 1969, HDB FRESHWATER FISHE, V1
[4]   CASCADING TROPHIC INTERACTIONS AND LAKE PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CARPENTER, SR ;
KITCHELL, JF ;
HODGSON, JR .
BIOSCIENCE, 1985, 35 (10) :634-639
[5]   THE ESTIMATION AND ANALYSIS OF PREFERENCE AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO FORAGING MODELS [J].
CHESSON, J .
ECOLOGY, 1983, 64 (05) :1297-1304
[6]   OMNIVOROUS ZOOPLANKTON AND PLANKTIVOROUS FISH [J].
CONFER, JL ;
BLADES, PI .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1975, 20 (04) :571-579
[7]  
DRENNER RW, 1984, T AM FISH SOC, V113, P397, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1984)113&lt
[8]  
397:PAPCIO&gt
[9]  
2.0.CO
[10]  
2