DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONS BETWEEN URINARY CADMIUM AND TUBULAR PROTEINURIA IN CADMIUM-EXPOSED WORKERS

被引:26
作者
JARUP, L [1 ]
ELINDER, CG [1 ]
机构
[1] HUDDINGE UNIV HOSP,KAROLINSKA INST,DEPT RENAL MED,S-14186 HUDDINGE,SWEDEN
关键词
CADMIUM; URINE; BATTERY WORKERS; TUBULAR PROTEINURIA; HEALTH BASED LIMIT;
D O I
10.1002/ajim.4700260605
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Cadmium in urine reflects the body burden in cadmium-exposed individuals. Urinary beta(2)-microglobulin is frequently used as a marker of tubular proteinuria with an arbitrarily chosen value (34 mu g/mmole creatinine) as the cut-off limit. Both this cut-off level and a lower limit (25 mu g/mmole creatinine) were used in a study of the relationship between urinary cadmium and beta(2)-microglobulin in 561 cadmium-exposed battery workers. There was a clear dose-response relation between the urinary cadmium level and the prevalence of tubular proteinuria ranging from 0.8% in the lowest exposure group, excreting less than 1 nmole cadmium/mmole creatinine, to 46.4% (50.0 for the lower cut-off level) in the highest exposure group with a mean urinary cadmium of 15 nmole/mmole creatinine. The relation between urinary cadmium and tubular proteinuria was also assessed using probit analysis. There was a 10% response at a urinary cadmium of 3 nmole/mmole creatinine. The impact of age on the dose-response relation was explored in two age groups with the cut-off point at 60 years of age, showing a 10% prevalence of tubular proteinuria at urinary cadmium levels of 1.5 nmole/mmole creatinine in this older age group and 5.0 nmole/mmole creatinine in the category under 60 years of age. The study thus indicates that the present health-based limit (10 nmole/mmole creatinine) proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO) is too high and it is suggested that a new limit should be set to 3 nmole/mmole creatinine. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:759 / 769
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   PULMONARY AND GASTRO-INTESTINAL EXPOSURE TO CADMIUM-OXIDE DUST IN A BATTERY FACTORY [J].
ADAMSSON, E ;
PISCATOR, M ;
NOGAWA, K .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1979, 28 (FEB) :219-222
[2]  
BUCHET JP, 1991, LANCET, V336, P699
[3]  
BUCHET JP, 1991, IN PRESS LANCET, V22, P337
[4]  
CHIA KS, 1989, BRIT J IND MED, V46, P165
[5]   BETA-2-MICROGLOBULINURIA AMONG WORKERS PREVIOUSLY EXPOSED TO CADMIUM - FOLLOW-UP AND DOSE-RESPONSE ANALYSES [J].
ELINDER, CG ;
EDLING, C ;
LINDBERG, E ;
KAGEDAL, B ;
VESTERBERG, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1985, 8 (06) :553-564
[6]   DOSE - RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF CADMIUM IN MAN - BODY BURDEN VS KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION [J].
ELLIS, KJ ;
YUEN, K ;
YASUMURA, S ;
COHN, SH .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 1984, 33 (01) :216-226
[7]   OCCUPATIONAL CADMIUM EXPOSURE AND RENAL STATUS [J].
FALCK, FY ;
FINE, LJ ;
SMITH, RG ;
MCCLATCHEY, KD ;
ANNESLEY, T ;
ENGLAND, B ;
SCHORK, AM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1983, 4 (04) :541-549
[8]  
FRIBERG L, 1986, CADMIUM HLTH TOXICOL, V2
[9]  
HORDON LD, 1991, BRIT J RHEUMATOL, V30, P115
[10]   OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO CADMIUM AND KIDNEY DYSFUNCTION [J].
JAKUBOWSKI, M ;
TROJANOWSKA, B ;
KOWALSKA, G ;
GENDEK, E ;
STARZYNSKI, Z ;
KRAJEWSKA, B ;
JAJTE, J .
INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 1987, 59 (06) :567-577