DETECTION OF FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS WITH SPIRAL CT - COMPARISON OF 4-MM AND 8-MM INTERSCAN SPACING

被引:122
作者
URBAN, BA [1 ]
FISHMAN, EK [1 ]
KUHLMAN, JE [1 ]
KAWASHIMA, A [1 ]
HENNESSEY, JG [1 ]
SIEGELMAN, SS [1 ]
机构
[1] JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV HOSP,DEPT RADIOL & RADIOL SCI,600 N WOLFE ST,BALTIMORE,MD 21205
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.160.4.8456665
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of this study was to determine if spiral CT with 4-mm interscan spacing results in increased confidence in or rate of detection of focal hepatic lesions when compared with spiral CT with 8-mm interscan spacing. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Spiral CT scans of the liver of 42 consecutive patients with suspected hepatic disease were independently reviewed by three senior radiologists in two sets: one set was reconstructed with 8-mm interscan spacing and one set was reconstructed with 4-mm interscan spacing. The slice thickness was 8 mm for both data sets. The number and sizes of focal hepatic lesions were documented. RESULTS. Thirty-three of the 42 patients had least one focal lesion. The lesion size varied from 2 mm to 21 cm. When 8-mm interscan spacing was used, 297 lesions were detected (212 were considered definite). When 4-mm interscan spacing was used, 318 lesions were detected (258 were considered definite). Therefore, 7% more lesions were detected with 4-mm interscan spacing than with 8-mm interscan spacing (p = .05), and 22% more were diagnosed definitively (p < .01). If lesions larger than 4 cm are excluded, 10% more lesions were detected with 4-mm interscan spacing, and 33% more were diagnosed definitively. Of the lesions detected exclusively with 4-mm interscan spacing, 69% were less than 1.0 cm in diameter. CONCLUSION. Spiral CT with smaller interscan spacing (4 instead of 8 mm) results in increased confidence in and rate of detection of focal liver lesions. The additional benefit is most significant with smaller lesions.
引用
收藏
页码:783 / 785
页数:3
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bautz W, 1991, RADIOLOGY, V181, P261
[2]  
BRINK JA, 1991, RADIOLOGY, V181, P277
[3]   PULMONARY NODULE - EVALUATION WITH SPIRAL VOLUMETRIC CT [J].
COSTELLO, P ;
ANDERSON, W ;
BLUME, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (03) :875-876
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF THE THORACIC AORTA BY SPIRAL CT [J].
COSTELLO, P ;
ECKER, CP ;
TELLO, R ;
HARTNELL, GG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (05) :1127-1130
[5]   SPIRAL CT OF THE THORAX WITH REDUCED VOLUME OF CONTRAST MATERIAL - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY [J].
COSTELLO, P ;
DUPUY, DE ;
ECKER, CP ;
TELLO, R .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (03) :663-666
[6]   SPIRAL CT OF THE PANCREAS [J].
DUPUY, DE ;
COSTELLO, P ;
ECKER, CP .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 183 (03) :815-818
[7]   SPIRAL CT OF THE PANCREAS WITH MULTIPLANAR DISPLAY [J].
FISHMAN, EK ;
WYATT, SH ;
NEY, DR ;
KUHLMAN, JE ;
SIEGELMAN, SS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 159 (06) :1209-1215
[8]   THE FREQUENCY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF SMALL (GREATER-THAN-OR-EQUAL-TO-15 MM) HEPATIC-LESIONS DETECTED BY CT [J].
JONES, EC ;
CHEZMAR, JL ;
NELSON, RC ;
BERNARDINO, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (03) :535-539
[9]   SPIRAL VOLUMETRIC CT WITH SINGLE-BREATH-HOLD TECHNIQUE, CONTINUOUS TRANSPORT, AND CONTINUOUS SCANNER ROTATION [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
SEISSLER, W ;
KLOTZ, E ;
VOCK, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (01) :181-183
[10]   PHYSICAL PERFORMANCE-CHARACTERISTICS OF SPIRAL CT SCANNING [J].
KALENDER, WA ;
POLACIN, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 18 (05) :910-915