SMALL HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMAS UNDETECTED ON 2-PHASED INCREMENTAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - ANGIOGRAPHIC AN CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS

被引:7
作者
HONDA, H
KANEKO, K
MAEDA, T
KUROIWA, T
FUKUYA, T
YOSHIMITSU, K
IRIE, H
AIBE, H
TAKENAKA, K
TSUNEYOSHI, M
SUGIMACHI, K
MASUDA, K
机构
[1] KYUSHU UNIV,FAC MED,DEPT PATHOL 2,FUKUOKA 812,JAPAN
[2] KYUSHU UNIV,FAC MED,DEPT SURG 2,FUKUOKA 812,JAPAN
关键词
LIVE; NEOPLASM; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ANGIOGRAPHY; HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA; PATHOLOGY;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199508000-00002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. To elucidate the characteristic clinicopathologic features of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) undetected on two-phased incremental computed tomography(CT). METHODS. Computed tomographic scans of 115 surgically resected small (less than or equal to 3 cm) HCCs from 83 patients were performed 45 seconds and 6 minutes after the administration of contrast material, These scans were compared with corresponding angiographic and histopathologic findings. RESULTS. Eighty HCCs (70%) were depicted on the early images; 73 (63%) on the delayed images; and 89 (77%) using two-phased incremental CT. The small HCCs undetected on the early images but seen histologically had the following characteristics: (1) absence of a fibrous capsule, (2) well-differentiated tumor, (3) replacing growth patterns of the tumors, (4) lack of fatty metamorphosis and/or clear cell changes, (5) hypovascular on angiography. Those not seen on delayed images had the following characteristics: (1) absence of a fibrous capsule, (2) replacing growth patterns, and (3) presence of portal tracts in the tumors. CONCLUSIONS. The replacing growth pattern and the presence of portal tracts correlate with the undetectability on CT, For HCCs undetected on CT, treatment methods must be considered carefully, because the HCCs may be receiving transsinusoidal and portal blood supplies.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 465
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   DYNAMIC CT DENSITOMETRY OF HEPATIC-TUMORS [J].
ARAKI, T ;
ITAI, Y ;
FURUI, S ;
TASAKA, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1980, 135 (05) :1037-1043
[2]   COMPARISON OF PRE-CONTRAST AND POST-CONTRAST CT IN HEPATIC MASSES [J].
BERLAND, LL ;
LAWSON, TL ;
FOLEY, WD ;
MELROSE, BL ;
CHINTAPALLI, KN ;
TAYLOR, AJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1982, 138 (05) :853-858
[3]   CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT IN ABDOMINAL CT - BOLUS VS INFUSION [J].
BURGENER, FA ;
HAMLIN, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1981, 137 (02) :351-358
[4]   CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT OF FOCAL HEPATIC-LESIONS IN CT - EFFECT OF SIZE AND HISTOLOGY [J].
BURGENER, FA ;
HAMLIN, DJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 140 (02) :297-301
[5]  
CHEN DS, 1982, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V83, P1109
[6]  
CONWAY JG, 1985, CANCER RES, V45, P3620
[7]  
EDMONDSON HA, 1954, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V7, P462, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(195405)7:3<462::AID-CNCR2820070308>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-E
[9]   CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUE FOR DYNAMIC HEPATIC COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC SCANNING [J].
FOLEY, WD ;
BERLAND, LL ;
LAWSON, TL ;
SMITH, DF ;
THORSEN, MK .
RADIOLOGY, 1983, 147 (03) :797-803
[10]   DYNAMIC HEPATIC CT [J].
FOLEY, WD .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :617-622