THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF MASS DRUG-THERAPY FOR INTESTINAL HELMINTHS

被引:16
作者
EVANS, DB
GUYATT, HL
机构
[1] World Bank, WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (TDR), WHO, Geneva
[2] Centre for the Epidemiology of Infectious Disease, University of Oxford, Oxford
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00019053-199508010-00004
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article reviews the principles involved in establishing the cost effectiveness of mass drug therapy for the major intestinal nematodes and the intestinal form of schistosomiasis, as well as the extent to which the available studies have provided definitive answers. For governments or agencies that have decided to introduce a control programme, there is considerable evidence about the comparative cost effectiveness of different types of delivery strategies, For example, mass treatment is more cost effective than selective treatment (treatment after individual screening) in high prevalence areas and at observed prices, Mass treatment targeted at known high risk groups, such as schoolchildren, for the major intestinal helminths (apart from hookworm) can be more cost effective than population-based mass treatment. However, this raises the question whether any form of mass anthelmintic chemotherapy is an efficient use of scare health resources in view of the competing demands for scarce public funds, and for the scarce resources of other funders of healthcare including donors, nongovernmental organisations and missions, Some evidence that it is an efficient use of resources is available; this article concludes by outlining the type of information that is required to strengthen the argument for mass therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:14 / 22
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Anderson R.M., May R.M., Helminth infections of humans: mathematical models, population dynamics and control, Adv Parasitol, 24, pp. 1-101, (1985)
[2]  
Guyatt H.L., Evans D., Economic considerations of helminth control, Parasitol Today, 8, pp. 397-402, (1992)
[3]  
Chan, Medley G.F., Jamison D., Et al., The evaluation of potential global morbidity attributable to intestinal nematode infections, Parasitology, 109, (1994)
[4]  
Halloran M.E., Bundy D.A.P., Pollitt E., Infectious disease and the Unesco Basic Education Initiative, Parasitol Today, 5, (1989)
[5]  
Bundy D.A.P., Is the hookworm just anOlher geohelminth, Hookworn diseaase–current status and new directions, (1990)
[6]  
Stephenson L.S., Latham M.C., Kurz K.M., Et al., Treatment with a single dose of albendazole improves growth of Kenyan schoolchildren with hookworn, Trichuris trichiura and Ascaris lumbricoides infections, Am J Trop Med Hyg, 41, pp. 78-87, (1989)
[7]  
Cooper E.S., Bundy D.A.P., MacDonald T.T., Et al., Growth suppression in the Trichuris dysentery syndrome, Eur J Clin Nutr, 44, (1990)
[8]  
Thein- H., Thane- T., Et al., A controlled chemotherapeutic intervention trial on the relationship between Ascaris lumbricoides infection and malnutrition in children, Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 85, (1991)
[9]  
Nokes C., Cooper E.S., Robinson B.A., Et al., Geohelminth infection and academic assessment in Jamaican children, Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg, 85, (1991)
[10]  
Nokes C., Grantham-McGregor S.M., Sawyer A.W., Et al., Moderate to heavy infections of Trichuris trichiura affect cognitive function in Jamaican school children, Parasitology, 104, (1992)