WHY ARE LOCAL RECURRENCES AFTER BREAST-CONSERVING THERAPY MORE FREQUENT IN YOUNGER PATIENTS

被引:213
作者
KURTZ, JM
JACQUEMIER, J
AMALRIC, R
BRANDONE, H
AYME, Y
HANS, D
BRESSAC, C
SPITALIER, JM
机构
[1] ACAD MEDITERRANEENNE ONCOL CLIN,MARSEILLE,FRANCE
[2] MARSEILLES CANC INST,DEPT ANAT PATHOL,MARSEILLE,FRANCE
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1990.8.4.591
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The influence of patient age risk of recurrence in the breast was retrospectively studied in 496 stage I-II invasive ductal carcinomas treated by macroscopically complete primary tumor excision followed by radiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 71 months, local recurrence occurred in 13 of 62 (21%) patients younger than 40 years, compared with 48 of 434 (11%) older patients (P < .025). Cox multivariate analysis of 18 parameters identified four that significantly determined risk: major lymphocytic stromal reaction (MCR), unsatisfactory resection margins, increasing histologic grade, and extensive intraductal cancer (DCIS) within the primary tumor. Compared with older patients, those younger than 40 years had tumors that more often exhibited MCR (36% v 20%, P < .01), histologic grade 3 (42% v 28%, P < .025), and very extensive DCIS (21% v 6%, P < .001). The status of resection margins did not differ significantly between younger and older patients. Restriction of Cox analysis to patients younger than 40 indicated that risk was adequately described by MCR and percentage of DCIS, without consideration of grade or margins. For patients younger than 40, local failure occurred in four of five (80%) tumors with both MCR and more than 50% DCIS, in eight of 25 (32%) with either, and one of 32 (3.1%) with neither of these morphologic features. This study suggests that the higher local failure risk observed in patients younger than 40 years reflects the greater prevalence of certain morphologic characteristics in breast cancers in younger patients. Age itself does not appear to be an independent determinate of rsik.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 598
页数:8
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
AMALRIC R, 1982, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V49, P30, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19820101)49:1<30::AID-CNCR2820490107>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-L
[3]  
AMALRIC R, 1982, HDB MED RADIOLOGIE, V19, P301
[4]  
AN T, 1987, AM J PATHOL, V128, P52
[5]   THE IMPACT OF TUMOR SIZE AND HISTOLOGY ON LOCAL-CONTROL AFTER BREAST-CONSERVING THERAPY [J].
BARTELINK, H ;
BORGER, JH ;
VANDONGEN, JA ;
PETERSE, JL .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1988, 11 (04) :297-303
[6]  
BHAN AK, 1983, J NATL CANCER I, V71, P507
[7]   LOCAL-CONTROL AND SURVIVAL OF BREAST-CANCER TREATED BY LIMITED SURGERY FOLLOWED BY IRRADIATION [J].
CALLE, R ;
VILCOQ, JR ;
ZAFRANI, P ;
VIELH, P ;
FOURQUET, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1986, 12 (06) :873-878
[8]   MARGINS OF LUMPECTOMY FOR BREAST-CANCER [J].
CARTER, D .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1986, 17 (04) :330-332
[9]   CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST - INTERRELATIONSHIPS AMONG HISTOPATHOLOGIC FEATURES, ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR ACTIVITY, AND AGE OF THE PATIENT [J].
CHABON, AB ;
GOLDBERG, JD ;
VENET, L .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1983, 14 (04) :368-372
[10]   BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCES WITH CONSERVATION THERAPY [J].
CLARK, RM ;
WILKINSON, RH ;
MICELI, PN ;
MACDONALD, WD .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1987, 10 (06) :461-468