VARIATION IN SPECIES RICHNESS ON SMALL GRASSLAND QUADRATS - NICHE STRUCTURE OR SMALL-SCALE PLANT MOBILITY

被引:48
作者
VANDERMAAREL, E
NOEST, V
PALMER, MW
机构
[1] Ecological Research Station Öland, Uppsala University, Uppsala, S-752 36
[2] Department of Botany, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma
关键词
ALVAR; CAROUSEL MODEL; FACILITATION; GUILD; NICHE LIMITATION; OLAND; SPATIAL DEPENDENCE;
D O I
10.2307/3236445
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
In this study we make clear that the significance of deviations from an expected variance in species richness as demonstrated in alvar grassland, is a function of spatial pattern at the scale richness was measured, i.e. 10 cm(2). If corrected for spatial dependence, more than half of the significant cases become nonsignificant. As regards cases of significant variance deficit, which has been interpreted as an indication of niche limitation, we suggest that there may be a simple physical limitation to the number of species on the scale of observation in the form of a low number of plant units which can find a place because of the modal plant size of the species involved. In most cases of significant variance deficit the modal size of the plant units involved was probably bigger than average. Insofar as a significant variance deficit can be demonstrated, the resulting species richness distribution curve should be analyzed and we propose a skewness test, enabling us to differentiate between significantly left-skewed curves ('niche limitation'), significantly right-skewed curves ('niche facilitation') and symmetrical curves. We present results obtained with the G-test, a log-likelihood ratio goodness of fit test. Only few cases of significantly left-skewed curves and a majority of symmetrical curves were found. Attempts to demonstrate guild proportionality in grasslands suffer from the heterogeneity of usuary distinguished guilds, such as annuals vs. perennials or graminoids vs. dicotyledons. We observe that niche limitation may occur in alvar grassland, but indications for niche facilitation are stronger. Finally, we conclude that deviations in species richness variance are interesting indications of community structure, but only of spatial structure. Niche structure resulting from assembly rules should be investigated through experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 752
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Cliff A.D., Ord J.K., Spatial processes: models and applications, (1981)
[2]  
Colwell R.K., Towards a unified approach to the study of species diversity, Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, pp. 75-91, (1979)
[3]  
Connell J.H., Slatyer R.O., Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization, The American Naturalist, 111, pp. 1119-1144, (1977)
[4]  
Diamond J.M., Assembly of species communities, Ecology and evolution of communities, pp. 342-344, (1975)
[5]  
Huber R., Changes in plant species richness in a calcareous grassland following changes in environmental conditions, Folia Geobot. Phytotaxon, 29, pp. 469-482, (1994)
[6]  
Hutchinson G.E., Homage to Santa Rosalia, or, why are there so many kinds of animals?, The American Naturalist, 93, pp. 145-159, (1959)
[7]  
Kershaw K.A., Looney J.H.H., Quantitative and dynamic plant ecology, (1985)
[8]  
Krahulec F., Rosen E., Van Der Maarel E., Preliminary classification and ecology of dry grassland communities on Ölands Stora Alvar (Sweden), Nordic Journal of Botany, 6, pp. 797-809, (1986)
[9]  
Kull K., Zobel M., Vegetation structure and species coexistence, Folia Geobot. Phytotax, 29, pp. 433-437, (1994)
[10]  
MacArthur R.H., Levins R., The limiting similarity, convergence, and divergence of coexisting species, The American Naturalist, 101, pp. 377-385, (1967)