SPINACH CYTOSOLIC FRUCTOSE-1,6-BISPHOSPHATASE - PURIFICATION, ENZYME PROPERTIES AND STRUCTURAL COMPARISONS

被引:27
作者
LADROR, US [1 ]
LATSHAW, SP [1 ]
MARCUS, F [1 ]
机构
[1] CHIRON CORP,CHIRON RES LABS,EMERYVILLE,CA
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY | 1990年 / 189卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1432-1033.1990.tb15463.x
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Cytosolic fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase from spinach leaves was purified to homogeneity and characterized. The pure enzyme has a subunit mass of 38 kDa, its Km values for fructose 1,6‐bisphosphate and Mg2+ are 1.5 μM and 260 mM, respectively, and its Vmax is 110–120 units/mg. It is inhibited by fructose 2,6‐bisphosphate and AMP with Ki values of 0.07 μM and 120 μM, respectively. About 90% of the primary structure of the spinach cytosolic fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase has been determined by amino‐acid sequencing. The sequence data demonstrate that the cytosolic enzyme lacks the sequence insert characteristic of chloroplast fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase. The data include also the sequences of peptides containing all seven cysteine residues. Only two of the seven cysteines are conserved between the two isozymes, none of which is believed to be involved with the light regulation of the chloroplast enzyme. Sequence comparisons between the spinach cytosolic enzyme and gluconeogenic fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatases from other species reveal similarity ranging over 47–54%, which is higher than the 40–45% similarity between the chloroplast enzyme and gluconeogenic fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatases. However, similarity between these isozymes and Escherichia coli fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatase are 44% and 47% for the cytosolic and chloroplast enzymes, respectively. Similarity between the cytosolic and chloroplast counterparts is 52%, indicating wide divergence between these two fructose‐1,6‐bisphosphatases. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 94
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, SYMBIOSIS CELL EVOLU
[2]   RAPID ANALYSIS OF AMINO-ACIDS USING PRE-COLUMN DERIVATIZATION [J].
BIDLINGMEYER, BA ;
COHEN, SA ;
TARVIN, TL .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY, 1984, 336 (01) :93-104
[3]  
BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
[4]   ENDOSYMBIOTIC ORIGIN AND CODON BIAS OF THE NUCLEAR GENE FOR CHLOROPLAST GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE FROM MAIZE [J].
BRINKMANN, H ;
MARTINEZ, P ;
QUIGLEY, F ;
MARTIN, W ;
CERFF, R .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1987, 26 (04) :320-328
[5]   CDNA SEQUENCE OF RAT-LIVER FRUCTOSE-1,6-BISPHOSPHATASE AND EVIDENCE FOR DOWN-REGULATION OF ITS MESSENGER-RNA BY INSULIN [J].
ELMAGHRABI, MR ;
PILKIS, J ;
MARKER, AJ ;
COLOSIA, AD ;
DANGELO, G ;
FRASER, BA ;
PILKIS, SJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1988, 85 (22) :8430-8434
[6]   AMINO-ACID-SEQUENCE STUDIES ON SHEEP LIVER FRUCTOSE-BISPHOSPHATASE .2. THE COMPLETE SEQUENCE [J].
FISHER, WK ;
THOMPSON, EOP .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1983, 36 (03) :235-250
[7]  
HAMILTON WDO, 1988, NUCLEIC ACIDS RES, V16, P87
[8]  
HUNKAPILLER MW, 1985, PROTEIN SEQUENCER US
[9]  
HUR YK, 1989, PLANT PHYSIOL, V89, pA407
[10]  
LADROR US, 1989, J CELL BIOL, V107, pA413