Assessment Might Dictate the Curriculum, but What Dictates Assessment?

被引:13
作者
Dawson, Phillip [1 ]
Bearman, Margaret [2 ]
Boud, David J. [3 ]
Hall, Matt [4 ]
Molloy, Elizabeth K. [5 ]
Bennett, Sue [6 ,7 ]
Joughin, Gordon [8 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Off Pro Vice Chancellor Learning & Teaching, Learning & Teaching, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, Hlth Profess Educ & Educ Res Team, HealthPEER, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Fac Arts & Social Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Monash Univ, Off Pro Vice Chancellor Learning & Teaching, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[5] Monash Univ, Fac Med Nursing & Hlth Sci, HealthPEER Team, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Woolongong, ICT Educ, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[7] Univ Woolongong, Educ IT Ctr, Fac Educ, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
[8] Univ Queensland, Teaching & Educ Dev Inst TEDI, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
assessment; decision-making; design; research; evidence;
D O I
10.2979/teachlearninqu.1.1.107
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Almost all tertiary educators make assessment choices, for example, when they create an assessment task, design a rubric, or write multiple-choice items. Educators potentially have access to a variety of evidence and materials regarding good assessment practice but may not choose to consult them or be successful in translating these into practice. In this article, we propose a new challenge for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning: the need to study the disjunction between proposals for assessment "best practice" and assessment in practice by examining the assessment decision-making of teachers. We suggest that assessment decision-making involves almost all university teachers, occurs at multiple levels, and is influenced by expertise, trust, culture, and policy. Assessment may dictate the curriculum from the student's perspective, and we argue that assessment decision-making dictates assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 111
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Understanding the design context for Australian university teachers: implications for the future of learning design [J].
Bennett, Sue ;
Thomas, Lisa ;
Agostinho, Shirley ;
Lockyer, Lori ;
Jones, Jennifer ;
Harper, Barry .
LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 36 (02) :151-167
[2]  
Boud D., 2007, RETHINKING ASSESSMEN, P14, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203964309
[3]  
Boud D., 2000, STUD CONTIN EDUC, V22, P151, DOI DOI 10.1080/713695728
[4]  
Boud D., 1995, ASSESSMENT LEARNING, P35
[5]   Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform [J].
Carless, David .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2009, 34 (01) :79-89
[6]   Teachers' conceptions of teaching, and the making of specific decisions in planning to teach [J].
Eley, MG .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 2006, 51 (02) :191-214
[7]  
Joughin G, 2009, ASSESSMENT, LEARNING AND JUDGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION, P13, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8905-3_2
[8]  
Kreber C., 2002, INNOVATIVE HIGHER ED, V27, P5, DOI [DOI 10.1023/A:1020464222360, 10.1023/a:1020464222360]
[9]   The memorial consequences of multiple-choice testing [J].
Marsh, Elizabeth J. ;
Roediger, Henry L., III ;
Bjork, Robert A. ;
Bjork, Elizabeth L. .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2007, 14 (02) :194-199
[10]   Changes in instructors' assessment thinking related to experimentation with new strategies [J].
Offerdahl, Erika G. ;
Tomanek, Debra .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (07) :781-795