MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING OF THE GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT - INVESTIGATION OF BABY MILK AS A LOW-COST CONTRAST-MEDIUM

被引:15
作者
BALZARINI, L
AIME, S
BARBERO, L
CEGLIA, E
PETRILLO, R
REYNER, J
TESS, JDT
MUSUMECI, R
机构
[1] Division of Diagnostic Radiology E, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milano
[2] Department of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Torino
关键词
CONTRAST MEDIA; MRI; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
D O I
10.1016/0720-048X(92)90148-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
After the incidental observation of the high signal intensity of the upper GI tract in a nourished baby, we tested eight baby milks; five different fresh commercial milks, one sweetened and condensed and two lyophilized milks in order to compare their ability to contrast MR images. The images were obtained with a 1.5 T magnet whereas the "in vitro" water proton relaxation time (T1 and T2) measurements were carried out at 0.5 T. After having selected the most effective lyophilized product, that was prepared according to the manufacturer's instructions, a group of 23 adult patients, 17 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 55.8 years (range 37 to 71 years) were examined. Thirteen patients had gastric cancer and ten patients had rectal or rectosigmoid junction tumors. The most effective imaging sequence was a spin-echo T1.w. After oral intake of milk a good contrast of the stomach, with sufficient distribution in the duodenum and the very proximal bowel, was achieved in all 13 patients with gastric cancer, as was a good depiction of the rectum and the recto-sigmoid junction after enema achieved in the 10 patients with rectal cancers. Disadvantages of lyophilized milk as a contrast agent are due to partial intestinal absorption, inhomogeneous distribution and irregular intestinal passage, whereas a clear advantage of lyophilized milk as a contrast agent is its good acceptance and palatable, inexpensive and non invasive properties. Because of these limitations lyophilized milk cannot be considered a real oral contrast medium but it can enhance MR imaging of the upper abdomen, and mainly of the lower GI tract in infants and adults.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 174
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Gerscovich, McGahan, Buonocore, Ablin, Lindfors, The rediscovery of infant feeding formula with magnetic resonance imaging, Pediatr Radiol, 20, pp. 147-151, (1990)
[2]  
Wesbey, Brasch, Engelstad, Moss, Crooks, Cerito, Nuclear magnetic resonance contrast enhancement study of the gastrointestinal tract of rats and a human volunteer using nontoxic oral iron solution, Radiology, 149, pp. 175-180, (1983)
[3]  
Lonnemark, Hemmingsson, Bach-Gansmo, Ericson, Oksendal, Nyman, Moxnes, Effect of superparamagnetic particles as oral contrast medium at magnetic resonance imaging — A phase I clinical study, Acta Radiol, 30, pp. 193-196, (1989)
[4]  
Mattrey, Hajek, Gylys-Morin, Baker, Martin, Long, Long, Perfluorochemicals as gastrointestinal contrast agents for MR imaging: preliminary studies in rats and humans, AJR, 148, pp. 1259-1263, (1987)
[5]  
Weinreb, Maravilla, Redman, Nunnally, Improved MR imaging of the upper abdomen with glucagon and gas, Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 8, pp. 835-838, (1989)
[6]  
Hahn, Stark, Lewis, Saini, Lewis, Wittemberg, Ferrucci, First clinical trial of a new superparamagnetic iron oxide for use as an oral gastrointestinal contrast agent in MR imaging, Radiology, 175, pp. 695-700, (1990)
[7]  
Wolf, Current status of MR imaging contrast agents: special report, Radiology, 172, pp. 709-710, (1989)
[8]  
Lonnemark, Hemmingsson, Ericsson, Oral superparamagnetic particles for magnetic resonance imaging. Effect in plain and viscous aqueous suspensions, Acta Radiol, 31, pp. 303-307, (1990)
[9]  
Mattrey, Perfluorooctylbromide: a new contrast agent for CT, sonography and MR imaging, AJR, 152, pp. 247-252, (1989)
[10]  
Listinsky, Bryant, Gastrointestinal contrast agents: a diagnostic approach, Magn Reson Med, 8, pp. 285-292, (1988)