The objective of this study was to determine patterns of pulmonary function abnormalities and to evaluate how adequately peak flow monitoring was correlated to other spirometric indices in childhood asthma. Ninety-one children, aged 8-15 years, with moderate-to-severe asthma were repeatedly tested in a summer camp. On-site medical staff permitted 24-hour-a-day supervision. Subjective and objective clinical evaluations of asthma status were made over 14 consecutive days. Detailed clinical history and clinical observations were made by an experienced staff, and a total of 2,663 pulmonary function tests were performed regularly three times daily and whenever a child sensed asthma symptoms. Patterns of obstruction were divided into large airway abnormalities and small airway abnormalities. There was a low concordance between standard large airway measures, such as the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) or the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (the FEV(1)), and measures of small airway obstruction, such as the forced expiratory flow rate 25-75% (FEF(25-75)). Normal PEFR measurements do not always indicate that all other pulmonary function measures are normal. In fact, 18% of children with a normal PEFR had abnormal FEF(25-75) values. Results demonstrated that the FEF(25-75) was the most specific and sensitive measure of airway obstruction. PEFR is widely used to monitor asthma symptoms objectively because it is technically simple to perform, relatively inexpensive, and helpful in most cases. It is, therefore, appropriate for asthma education programs to recommend PEFR as an objective measure to guide in making therapeutic decisions. Our data and clinical observations support the ''Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma'' of the NIH Health Asthma Education Program that suggest that children have more complete pulmonary function testing along with frequent PEFR measures. Many children may appear asymptomatic, while recording normal PEFR measures, and still having significant asthma. Repeated pulmonary function testing and evaluation of the pattern of respiratory obstruction aids in managing this challenging group. We recommend that efforts be made to develop a simple and inexpensive method of measuring FEF(25-75) that will allow this measurement to be made even at home. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
