THE 1957 GREAT ALEUTIAN EARTHQUAKE

被引:73
作者
JOHNSON, JM
TANIOKA, Y
RUFF, LJ
SATAKE, K
KANAMORI, H
SYKES, LR
机构
[1] Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
[2] Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California
[3] Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Department of Geological Sciences, Columbia University, Palisades, New York
关键词
SUBDUCTION ZONES; ALEUTIAN ARC; TSUNAMIS; EARTHQUAKE PARAMETERS;
D O I
10.1007/BF00875966
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The 9 March 1957 Aleutian earthquake has been estimated as the third largest earthquake this century and has the longest aftershock zone of any earthquake ever recorded-1200 km. However, due to a lack of high-quality seismic data, the actual source parameters for this earthquake have been poorly determined. We have examined all the available waveform data to determine the seismic moment, rupture area, and slip distribution. These data include body, surface and tsunami waves. Using body waves, we have estimated the duration of significant moment release as 4 min. From surface wave analysis, we have determined that significant moment release occurred only in the western half of the aftershock zone and that the best estimate for the seismic moment is 50-100 x 10(20) Nm. Using the tsunami waveforms, we estimated the source area of the 1957 tsunami by backward propagation. The tsunami source area is smaller than the aftershock zone and is about 850 km long. This does not include the Unalaska Island area in the eastern end of the aftershock zone, making this area a possible seismic gap and a possible site of a future large or great earthquake. We also inverted the tsunami waveforms for the slip distribution. Slip on the 1957 rupture zone was highest in the western half near the epicenter. Little slip occurred in the eastern half. The moment is estimated as 88 x 10(20) Nm, or M(w) = 8.6, making it the seventh largest earthquake during the period 1900 to 1993. We also compare the 1957 earthquake to the 1986 Andreanof Islands earthquake, which occurred within a segment of the 1957 rupture area. The 1986 earthquake represents a rerupturing of the major 1957 asperity.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 28
页数:26
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Abe K., Size of Great Earthquakes of 1873–1974 Inferred from Tsunami Data, Journal of Geophysical Research, 84, pp. 1561-1568, (1979)
[2]  
Beck S., Ruff L., Rupture Process of the Great 1963 Kurile Islands Earthquake Sequence: Asperity Interaction and Multiple Event Rupture, Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, pp. 14123-14138, (1987)
[3]  
Boyd T.M., Nabelek J.L., Rupture Process of the Andreanof Islands Earthquake of May 7, 1986, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78, pp. 1653-1673, (1988)
[4]  
Das S., Kostrov B.V., Inversion for Seismic Slip Rate History and Distribution with Stabilizing Constraints: Application to the 1986 Andreanof Islands Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 95, pp. 6899-6913, (1990)
[5]  
DeMets C., Gordon R.G., Argus D.F., Stein S., Current Plate Motions, Geophys. J. Int., 101, pp. 425-478, (1990)
[6]  
Ekstrom G., Engdahl E.R., Earthquake Source Parameters and Stress Distribution in the Adak Island Region of the Central Aleutian Islands, Alaska, Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, pp. 15499-15519, (1989)
[7]  
Fukao Y., Furumoto M., Stress Drops, Wave Spectra and Recurrence Intervals of Great Earthquakes—Implications of the Etorofu Earthquake of 1958 November 6, Geophysical Journal International, 57, pp. 23-40, (1979)
[8]  
Gilbert F., Dziewonski A.M., An Application of Normal Mode Theory to the Retrieval of Structural Parameters and Source Mechanisms from Seismic Spectra, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 278, pp. 187-269, (1975)
[9]  
Hatori T., Tsunami Magnitude and Source Area of the Aleutian-Alaska Tsunamis, Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst., Univ. of Tokyo, 56, pp. 97-110, (1981)
[10]  
Houston H., Engdahl E.R., A Comparison of the Spatio-temporal Distribution of Moment Release for the 1986 Andreanof Islands Earthquake with Relocated Seismicity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 16, pp. 1421-1424, (1989)