LOW-LEVEL LASER THERAPY FOR DENTINAL TOOTH HYPERSENSITIVITY

被引:90
作者
GERSCHMAN, JA
RUBEN, J
GEBARTEAGLEMONT, J
机构
[1] Oro-Facial Pain Clinic, Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne
[2] Department of Social Science, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology
关键词
DENTINAL HYPERSENSITIVITY; LOW LEVEL LASER THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1834-7819.1994.tb03105.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
A comparative double blind study testing low level laser therapy (Gallium/Aluminium/Arsenide laser [GaAIAs]) against placebo was carried out in the management of dentinal tooth hypersensitivity. Subjects demonstrating dentinal hypersensitivity and complying with strict selection criteria were randomly assigned to an active and placebo group. Low level laser therapy was applied for one minute to both the apex and cervical area of the tooth; and reapplied at one week, two-week and eight-week intervals. Dentinal hypersensitivity was rated at each visit. There were 28 subjects in the placebo group and 22 and 21 subjects, respectively, in the tactile sensitivity and thermal sensitivity groups. Comparisons between the groups were conducted using independent groups t-test. In both the tactile and thermal sensitivity groups differences between the active and placebo groups were significant from the first week and increased further in the second and eighth weeks. The mean value of thermal sensitivity decreased 67 per cent (p <0.001) compared with placebo (17 per cent) and tactile sensitivity decreased 65 per cent (p =.002) compared with placebo (21 per cent) at eight weeks. Results demonstrate that the GaAIAs laser is an effective method for the treatment of both thermal and tactile dentinal hypersensitivity. There were no reported adverse reactions or instances of oral irritation.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 357
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Rosenthal MW., Historic review of the management of tooth hypersensitivity, Dent Clin North Am, 34, pp. 403-427, (1990)
  • [2] Scherman A., Jacobsen P., Managing dentine hypersensitivity, J Am Dent Assoc, 123, pp. 57-61, (1992)
  • [3] Curro FA., Tooth hypersensitivity. Editorial, Dent Clin North Am, 34, pp. 9-10, (1990)
  • [4] Zakariasen K., Shedding new light on lasers, J Am Dent Assoc, 124, pp. 30-35, (1993)
  • [5] Myers TD., Lasers in dentistry, 1991, J Am Dent Assoc, 122, pp. 47-91, (1991)
  • [6] Midda M., Renton-Harper P., Lasers in dentistry, Br Dent J, 120, pp. 343-346, (1991)
  • [7] Karu T., Photobiology of low power laser effects, Health Physics, 56, pp. 691-704, (1989)
  • [8] Takeda Y., Irradiation effect of low‐energy laser in alveolar bone after tooth extraction in rats, 1988, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 17, pp. 388-391, (1988)
  • [9] Strang R., Moselerley H., Carmichael J., Soft lasers – have they a place in dentistry, Br Dent J, 165, (1988)
  • [10] Senda A., Gomi A., Tani T., Et al., A clinical study on ‘soft laser 632’, a He‐Ne low energy medical laser. 1: Pain relief immediately after irradiation, Aichi-Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi, 23, pp. 773-780, (1985)