ACCURACY OF THE BOYS AND BERNARDI FUNCTION COUNTERPOISE METHOD

被引:227
作者
GUTOWSKI, M
VANDUIJNEVELDTVANDERIJDT, GC
VANLENTHE, JH
VANDUIJNEVELDT, FB
机构
[1] UNIV WARSAW,DEPT CHEM,PL-02093 WARSAW,POLAND
[2] UNIV UTAH,DEPT CHEM,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84112
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.465106
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The performance of the Boys and Bernardi function counterpoise (FCP) method in eliminating the basis set superposition error (BSSE) is studied for He-2, at R=5.6 a.u., within the supermolecular coupled electron pair approximation (CEPA-1) method. A series of one-electron Gaussian basis sets is designed that allows a systematic approach to the basis set limit value of the interaction energy. Every basis set contains a part suitable to reproduce the atomic correlation energy and a second part optimized for the dispersion interaction in He-2. BSSE-free correlated first-order interaction energies [E(1)], calculated using perturbation theory, are reported for each of these sets. Extrapolation to the basis set limit yields a new value of 33.60+/-0.02 muH for E(1) at R=5.6 a.u. Extending previous work, the supermolecular CEPA-1 interaction energies for each set are then compared to the total of E(1) and the BSSE-free Moller-Plesset second-order dispersion energy reported previously. While for some basis sets the uncorrected DELTAE values deviate up to 43 K from the perturbation estimate, the FCP-corrected results always agree within 0.4 K. A virtuals-only counterpoise procedure is considered as well, but fails badly. The remaining discrepancies in the FCP results are ascribed to a failure of the Moller-Plesset approach to precisely model the dispersion energy at the CEPA level. This problem is removed in a further, more stringent test where supermolecular E(int)CEPA-intra results, in which only the intra-atomic correlation (at the CEPA-1 level) is taken into account, are directly compared to the BSSE-free E(1) values. In this test the FCP-corrected supermolecular results agree, for the larger sets, to within 0.001 K with the results expected on the basis of E(1). These findings demonstrate, for the first time, that at least in He-2 the FCP recipe yields interaction energies that correspond precisely (to machine precision) to the basis set and correlation method at hand.
引用
收藏
页码:4728 / 4738
页数:11
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Ahlrichs R., 1983, Methods in Computational Molecular Physics. Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, P209
[2]   MANY-BODY PERTURBATION CALCULATIONS AND COUPLED ELECTRON PAIR MODELS [J].
AHLRICHS, R .
COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1979, 17 (1-2) :31-45
[3]  
Ahlrichs R., 1987, ADV CHEM PHYS, V67, P501, DOI [10.1002/9780470142936.ch9, DOI 10.1002/9780470142936.CH9]
[4]  
ALMLOF J, 1989, INT J QUANTUM CHEM S, V23, P345
[5]  
ASTRAND PO, 1991, J PHYS CHEM-US, V95, P6395, DOI 10.1021/j100169a058
[6]   AN ANALYSIS OF THE ITS-90 RELATIONS FOR THE NONIDEALITY OF HE-3 AND HE-4 - RECOMMENDED RELATIONS BASED ON A NEW INTERATOMIC POTENTIAL FOR HELIUM [J].
AZIZ, RA ;
SLAMAN, MJ .
METROLOGIA, 1990, 27 (04) :211-219
[7]   AN EXAMINATION OF ABINITIO RESULTS FOR THE HELIUM POTENTIAL-ENERGY CURVE [J].
AZIZ, RA ;
SLAMAN, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 94 (12) :8047-8053
[8]   BASIS SET SUPERPOSITION ERROR EFFECTS ON ELECTRONIC AND NU-FX,NU-F...N STRETCHING MODES OF HYDROGEN-BONDED SYSTEMS FX...NCX (X = H,D) [J].
BOUTEILLER, Y ;
BEHROUZ, H .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 96 (08) :6033-6038
[9]   CALCULATION OF SMALL MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BY DIFFERENCES OF SEPARATE TOTAL ENERGIES - SOME PROCEDURES WITH REDUCED ERRORS [J].
BOYS, SF ;
BERNARDI, F .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1970, 19 (04) :553-&
[10]   ELECTRONIC WAVE FUNCTIONS FOR ATOM .2. SOME ASPECTS OF CONVERGENCE OF CONFIGURATION INTERACTION EXPANSION FOR GROUND STATES OF HE ISOELECTRONIC SERIES [J].
BUNGE, CF .
THEORETICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1970, 16 (02) :126-&