PUBLICATIONS ON CLINICAL-TRIALS WITH X-RAY CONTRAST-MEDIA - DIFFERENCES IN QUALITY BETWEEN JOURNALS AND DECADES

被引：12

作者：

ANDREW, E

EIDE, H

FUGLERUD, P

HAGEN, EK

KRISTOFFERSEN, DT

LAMBRECHTS, M

WAALER, A

WEIBYE, M

机构：

[1] Research and Development Division, Nycomed A.S., Oslo

来源：

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 1990年 / 10卷 / 02期

关键词：

Clinical trial; methodology; Contrast media; Reporting standard;

D O I：

10.1016/0720-048X(90)90114-Q

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

The objective of the present study was to investigate the quality of clinical trial publications on X-ray contrast media by use of a simple criteria list with 11 items. The publication quality in the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s and in five radiological journals was compared. One hundred and three articles retrieved from the literature and published in Br J Radiol (British), Acta Radiol (Scandinavian), Radiology (American), RöFo (German) and in Ann Radiol (French) were finally included. The adapted method seemed to be suitable for roughly assessing the quality of contrast medium publications. The present reporting standard has increased considerably since the 1960s, however a higher standard is still needed. Although the limited material gathered in our investigation does not allow unequivocal statements, the results indicate that the reporting standard of the 1980s in the selected American, British and Scandinavian radiological journals was somewhat better than in the German journal and better than in the French journal. Use of the present or other assessment methods is one tool to improve the reporting standard. © 1990.

引用

页码：92 / 97

页数：6

共 17 条

[1] Andrew, Method for assessment of the reporting standard of clinical trails with roentgen contrast media, Acta Radiol Diagn, 25, pp. 55-88, (1984)
[2] Andrew, Evaluation of the vascular clinical trial program of metrizamide and iohexol, Acta Radiol Diagn, 25, pp. 59-64, (1984)
[3] Badgley, An assessment of research methods reported in 103 scientific articles from two Canadian medical journals, Can Med Ass J, 85, pp. 246-250, (1965)
[4] Barni, Ethical and medical legal problems in clinical research of contrast media, Radiol Med, 72, pp. 65-68, (1986)
[5] Belloni, Cerutti, Fiori, Moschini, Porta, Clinical trials of contrast media in radiology (neuroradiology). A methodological proposal, Radiol Med, 72, pp. 72-76, (1986)
[6] Fletcher, Fletcher, Clinical research in general medical journals, New Engl J Med, 301, pp. 180-183, (1979)
[7] Friedman, Furberg, DeMets, Fundamentals of clinical trials, (1981)
[8] Hemminki, Quality for clinical trials. A concern of three decades, Methods Inform Med, 21, pp. 81-82, (1982)
[9] Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, BMJ, 296, pp. 401-405, (1988)
[10] Kinnison, Powe, Steinberg, Results of randomized controlled trials of low-versus-high osmolality contrast media, Radiology, 170, pp. 381-389, (1989)

← 1 2 →