EFFECTIVE POPULATION-SIZE IN WINTER-RUN CHINOOK SALMON

被引:52
作者
HEDRICK, PW
HEDGECOCK, D
HAMELBERG, S
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS, BODEGA MARINE LAB, BODEGA BAY, CA 94923 USA
[2] US FISH & WILDLIFE SERV, RED BLUFF, CA 96080 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.09030615.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Winter-run chinook salmon from the Sacramento River, California, is federally listed as endangered Since 1989 there has been a program to augment the natural population by capturing adults, artificially spawning them, raising the young, and releasing the smelt. Here we estimate the effective population size of these captive-raised fish, the natural run, and the combination of both groups over the three-year period from 1991 to 1993. We find that the most appropriate estimate of the effective population size of the captive-raised progeny is a variance estimate of effective population size standardized so that the number of released smelts returning to spawn was the same as the number of spawners used to produce the smelts originally. We have generated 10,000 random samples to simulate returns from these released progeny. The estimates of the effective population sizes in 1991, 1992, and 1993 were only 7.02, 19.07, and 7.74, respectively. We then determined limits on the effective population size of the natural run based on 0.1 and 0.333 of the run-size estimates. Using estimates of the captive proportion of the run, the minimum estimates of the effective population size of the overall run for the three years were 21.9, 127.3, and 39.0, and the maximum estimates were 61.6, 401.0, and 108.7. It does not appear that the hatchery program has reduced the overall effective population size. The run sizes in each year are extremely low, however, and it is possible that fish will be lost from this run in one of the years in the immediate future, making reestablishment of a healthy run even more difficult.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 624
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   DELAY OF ADAPTATION TO CAPTIVE BREEDING BY EQUALIZING FAMILY-SIZE [J].
ALLENDORF, FW .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1993, 7 (02) :416-419
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, CONSERVATION BIOL SC
[3]   USE OF LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM DATA TO ESTIMATE EFFECTIVE SIZE OF HATCHERY AND NATURAL FISH POPULATIONS [J].
BARTLEY, D ;
BAGLEY, M ;
GALL, G ;
BENTLEY, B .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1992, 6 (03) :365-375
[4]   The variant call format and VCFtools [J].
Danecek, Petr ;
Auton, Adam ;
Abecasis, Goncalo ;
Albers, Cornelis A. ;
Banks, Eric ;
DePristo, Mark A. ;
Handsaker, Robert E. ;
Lunter, Gerton ;
Marth, Gabor T. ;
Sherry, Stephen T. ;
McVean, Gilean ;
Durbin, Richard .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2011, 27 (15) :2156-2158
[5]  
CROW JF, 1988, EVOLUTION, V42, P482, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb04154.x
[6]   MEASUREMENT OF GENE FREQUENCY DRIFT IN SMALL POPULATIONS [J].
CROW, JF ;
MORTON, NE .
EVOLUTION, 1955, 9 (02) :202-214
[7]  
Ehrlich P.R., 1981, EXTINCTION CAUSES CO
[8]  
FOOSE T J, 1988, International Zoo Yearbook, V27, P26
[9]  
Franklin I.R., 1980, CONSERVATION BIOL EV, P135
[10]   SEA-TURTLE CONSERVATION AND HALFWAY TECHNOLOGY [J].
FRAZER, NB .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1992, 6 (02) :179-184