THE STRUCTURE OF COMMON PSYCHIATRIC-SYMPTOMS - HOW MANY DIMENSIONS OF NEUROSIS

被引:32
作者
ORMEL, J
OLDEHINKEL, AJ
GOLDBERG, DP
HODIAMONT, PPG
WILMINK, FW
BRIDGES, K
机构
[1] UNIV GRONINGEN,DEPT HLTH SCI,9700 RB GRONINGEN,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV NIJMEGEN,DEPT PSYCHIAT,NIJMEGEN,NETHERLANDS
[3] OUTPATIENT CLIN PSYCHIAT HOSP LICHT KRACHT,ASSEN,NETHERLANDS
[4] UNIV MANCHESTER,MENTAL ILLNESS RES UNIT,MANCHESTER,LANCS,ENGLAND
[5] INST PSYCHIAT,LONDON,ENGLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0033291700033444
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In order to replicate and elaborate the two-dimensional model of depression and anxiety underlying the structure of common psychiatric symptoms proposed by Goldberg et al. (1987), we carried out latent trait analyses on PSE symptom data of the original Manchester study and two recent Dutch studies. We used the same analytical strategy as Goldberg et al. to facilitate comparison with the earlier work. It was found that a more comprehensive set of common psychiatric symptoms caused an extra, third dimension to emerge, so that the earlier anxiety dimension became split between a specific anxiety axis characterized by situational and phobic anxiety and avoidance, and a non-specific anxiety axis characterized by free-floating anxiety, various symptoms relating to tension, irritability and restlessness. It is argued that three dimensions are sufficient to account for the covariance between common psychiatric symptoms. A fairly consistent correlation between the non-specific anxiety and the depression dimension was found across sites, as well as independence of the specific anxiety dimension from the other two dimensions. Furthermore, the depression dimension was robust with similar symptom profiles across samples, but there appeared to be local differences in the structure of anxiety symptoms.
引用
收藏
页码:521 / 530
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   TRIPARTITE MODEL OF ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION - PSYCHOMETRIC EVIDENCE AND TAXONOMIC IMPLICATIONS [J].
CLARK, LA ;
WATSON, D .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 100 (03) :316-336
[2]   THE UTILITY OF LATENT TRAIT MODELS IN PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY [J].
DUNCANJONES, P ;
GRAYSON, DA ;
MORAN, PAP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1986, 16 (02) :391-405
[3]  
FRASER C, 1986, NOHARM 2 FORTRAN PRO
[4]   DIMENSIONS OF NEUROSES SEEN IN PRIMARY-CARE SETTINGS [J].
GOLDBERG, DP ;
BRIDGES, K ;
DUNCANJONES, P ;
GRAYSON, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1987, 17 (02) :461-470
[5]   DIAGNOSES OF DEMENTIA AND DEPRESSION - A LATENT TRAIT ANALYSIS OF THEIR PERFORMANCE [J].
GRAYSON, DA ;
HENDERSON, AS ;
KAY, DWK .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1987, 17 (03) :667-675
[6]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SYMPTOMS AND DIAGNOSES OF MINOR PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDER IN GENERAL-PRACTICE [J].
GRAYSON, DA ;
BRIDGES, K ;
DUNCANJONES, P ;
GOLDBERG, DP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1987, 17 (04) :933-942
[7]   EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASPECTS OF PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDER IN A DUTCH HEALTH AREA [J].
HODIAMONT, P ;
PEER, N ;
SYBEN, N .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1987, 17 (02) :495-505
[8]  
Kandel E.R., 1991, PRINCIPLES NEURAL SC, V3rd ed., P869
[9]  
MACKINNON A, 1995, LATENT TRAIT ANAL IN
[10]   LINEAR VERSUS NON-LINEAR MODELS IN ITEM RESPONSE THEORY [J].
MCDONALD, RP .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1982, 6 (04) :379-396