MIDWIFE MANAGED DELIVERY UNIT - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED COMPARISON WITH CONSULTANT LED CARE

被引:114
作者
HUNDLEY, VA
CRUICKSHANK, FM
LANG, GD
GLAZENER, CMA
MILNE, JM
TURNER, M
BLYTH, D
MOLLISON, J
DONALDSON, C
机构
[1] ABERDEEN ROYAL HOSP NHS TRUST,ABERDEEN AB9 2ZA,SCOTLAND
[2] UNIV ABERDEEN,HLTH SERV RES UNIT,ABERDEEN AB9 2ZD,SCOTLAND
[3] UNIV ABERDEEN,DEPT PUBL HLTH,HLTH ECON RES UNIT,ABERDEEN AB9 2ZD,SCOTLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.309.6966.1400
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective-To examine whether intrapartum care and delivery of low risk women in a midwife managed delivery unit differs from that in a consultant led labour ward. Design-Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio between the midwives unit and the labour ward. Setting-Aberdeen Maternity Hospital, Grampian. Subjects-2844 low risk women, as defined by existing booking criteria for general practitioner units in Grampian. 1900 women were randomised to the midwives unit and 944 to the labour ward. Main outcome measures-Maternal and perinatal morbidity. Results-Of the women randomised to the midwives unit, 647 (34%) were transferred to the labour ward antepartum, 303 (16%) were transferred intrapartum, and 80 (4%) were lost to follow up. 870 women (46%) were delivered in the midwives unit. Primigravid women (255/596, 43%) were significantly more likely to be transferred intrapartum than multigravid women (48/577, 8%). Significant differences between the midwives unit and labour ward were found in monitoring, fetal distress, analgesia, mobility, and use of episiotomy. There were no significant differences in mode of delivery or fetal outcome. Conclusions-Midwife managed intrapartum care for low risk women results in more mobility and less intervention with no increase in neonatal morbidity. However, the high rate of transfer shows that antenatal criteria are unable to determine who will remain at low risk throughout pregnancy and labour.
引用
收藏
页码:1400 / 1404
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1990, SPSS REFERENCE GUIDE
  • [2] Casagrande J. T., 1978, APPLIED STATISTICS, V27, P176
  • [3] THE USE OF A BIRTHROOM - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING DELIVERY WITH THAT IN THE LABOR WARD
    CHAPMAN, MG
    JONES, M
    SPRING, JE
    DESWIET, M
    CHAMBERLAIN, GVP
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1986, 93 (02): : 182 - 187
  • [4] ENKIN MW, 1993, PREGNANCY CHILDBIRTH
  • [5] OUTCOMES AND PROCEDURES IN LOW-RISK BIRTH - A COMPARISON OF HOSPITAL AND BIRTH CENTER SETTINGS
    FELDMAN, E
    HURST, M
    [J]. BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 1987, 14 (01): : 18 - 24
  • [6] AMBULATION IN LABOR
    FLYNN, AM
    KELLY, J
    HOLLINS, G
    LYNCH, PF
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 2 (6137) : 591 - 593
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF LOW-RISK PREGNANT-WOMEN BOOKED FOR DELIVERY IN 2 SYSTEMS OF CARE - SHARED-CARE (CONSULTANT) AND INTEGRATED GENERAL-PRACTICE UNIT .1. OBSTETRICAL PROCEDURES AND NEONATAL OUTCOME
    KLEIN, M
    LLOYD, I
    REDMAN, C
    BULL, M
    TURNBULL, AC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1983, 90 (02): : 118 - 122
  • [8] A COMPARISON OF LOW-RISK PREGNANT-WOMEN BOOKED FOR DELIVERY IN 2 SYSTEMS OF CARE - SHARED-CARE (CONSULTANT) AND INTEGRATED GENERAL-PRACTICE UNIT .2. LABOR AND DELIVERY MANAGEMENT AND NEONATAL OUTCOME
    KLEIN, M
    LLOYD, I
    REDMAN, C
    BULL, M
    TURNBULL, AC
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1983, 90 (02): : 123 - 128
  • [9] A PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF SELECTIVE AND UNIVERSAL ELECTRONIC FETAL MONITORING IN 34,995 PREGNANCIES
    LEVENO, KJ
    CUNNINGHAM, FG
    NELSON, S
    ROARK, M
    WILLIAMS, ML
    GUZICK, D
    DOWLING, S
    ROSENFELD, CR
    BUCKLEY, A
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (10) : 615 - 618
  • [10] LOWE SW, 1987, J R COLL GEN PRACT, V137, P484