FACTORS AFFECTING THE CLINICAL-EFFICIENCY OF ULTRASONIC ENDODONTICS - A SCANNING ELECTRON-MICROSCOPY STUDY

被引:22
作者
CAMERON, JA
机构
[1] Charlestown, New South Wales, 2290
关键词
EDTA; SMEAR LAYER; SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE; ULTRASOUND;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00156.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
The purpose of this pilot study was to investigate some of the clinical variables in ultrasonic endodontics. Forty extracted human teeth with a single, straight root 21-25 mm in length were prepared using combinations of the following variables: hand or ultrasonic instrumentation; apical seat prepared to file sizes 35, 40, 45 or 50; 1 ml of water, 4% sodium hypochlorite or EDTAC as irrigant between each instrument size; three brands of ultrasound generator and inserts; a 'low', 'medium' or 'high' effective power output; a tuned or untuned circuit; post-instrumentation ultrasonic irrigation with either 4% sodium hypochlorite, EDTAC, or the two used in sequence. The specimens were viewed in a scanning electron microscope and scored for the presence or absence of a smear layer at levels < 1 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm from the apical seat. The most effective combination, as tested, was hand instrumentation to file size 40 with 1 ml EDTAC irrigation between each instrument size, supplemented by intermittent flush irrigation with EDTAC with ultrasound then 4% sodium hypochlorite with ultrasound. This technique left a minimum smear layer restricted to the apical seat. Other combinations of instrumentation and irrigation were not consistent in their effectiveness.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 53
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Abbott PV, Heijkoop PS, Cardaci SC, Hume WR, Heithersay GS, An SEM study of the effects of different irrigation sequences and ultrasonics, International Endodontic Journal, 24, pp. 308-316, (1991)
[2]  
Abou-Rass M, Piccinino MV, The effectiveness of four clinical irrigation methods on the removal of root canal debris, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 54, pp. 323-328, (1982)
[3]  
Alacam T, Scanning electron microscope study comparing the efficacy of endodontic irrigating systems, International Endodontic Journal, 20, pp. 287-294, (1987)
[4]  
Baumgartner JC, Mader CL, A scanning electron microscopic evaluation of four root canal irrigation regimes, Journal of Endodontics, 13, pp. 147-157, (1987)
[5]  
Berg MS, Jacobsen EL, Be Gole EA, Remeikis NA, A comparison of five irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopic study, Journal of Endodontics, 12, pp. 192-197, (1986)
[6]  
Cameron JA, The use of ultrasonics in the removal of the smear layer: A scanning electron microscope study, Journal of Endodontics, 9, pp. 289-292, (1983)
[7]  
Ciucchi B, Khettabi M, Holz J, The effectiveness of different endodontic irrigation procedures on the removal of the smear layer: a scanning electron microscopic study, International Endodontic Journal, 22, pp. 21-28, (1989)
[8]  
Cunningham WT, Martin H, A scanning electron microscope evaluation of root canal debridement with the endosonic ultrasonic Synergistic system, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 53, pp. 527-531, (1982)
[9]  
Dow PR, EDTA — time for re‐evaluation, International Endodontic Journal, 17, pp. 2-5, (1984)
[10]  
Druttman ACS, Stock CJR, An in vitro comparison of ultrasonic and conventional methods of irrigant replacement, International Endodontic Journal, 22, pp. 174-178, (1989)