AN EMPIRICAL-COMPARISON OF PROBIT AND OLS REGRESSION HYPOTHESIS TESTS

[1] AMEMIYA T, 1981, J ECON LIT, V19, P1483

[2] CHARACTERISTICS OF FIRMS ELECTING EARLY ADOPTION OF SFAS-52 [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1986, 8 (02) : 143 - 158

[3] Bowen R., 1981, J ACCOUNT ECON, V3, P151

[4] Casey C.J., 1986, ACCOUNT REV, P249

[5] EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION, MANAGEMENT TURNOVER, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE - AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1985, 7 (1-3) : 43 - 66

[6] Daganzo C., 1979, MULTINOMIAL PROBIT

[7] THE EFFECTS OF DEBT COVENANTS AND POLITICAL COSTS ON THE CHOICE OF ACCOUNTING METHODS - THE CASE OF ACCOUNTING FOR R-AND-D COSTS [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1983, 5 (03) : 195 - 211

[8] CONVENIENT SPECIFICATION TESTS FOR LOGIT AND PROBIT MODELS [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1984, 25 (03) : 241 - 262

[9] THE EFFECT OF OWNER VERSUS MANAGEMENT CONTROL ON THE CHOICE OF ACCOUNTING METHODS [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1982, 4 (01) : 41 - 53

[10] DOPUCH N, 1987, ACCOUNT REV JUL, P431

[1] AMEMIYA T, 1981, J ECON LIT, V19, P1483

[2] CHARACTERISTICS OF FIRMS ELECTING EARLY ADOPTION OF SFAS-52 [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1986, 8 (02) : 143 - 158

[3] Bowen R., 1981, J ACCOUNT ECON, V3, P151

[4] Casey C.J., 1986, ACCOUNT REV, P249

[5] EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION, MANAGEMENT TURNOVER, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE - AN EMPIRICAL-INVESTIGATION [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1985, 7 (1-3) : 43 - 66

[6] Daganzo C., 1979, MULTINOMIAL PROBIT

[7] THE EFFECTS OF DEBT COVENANTS AND POLITICAL COSTS ON THE CHOICE OF ACCOUNTING METHODS - THE CASE OF ACCOUNTING FOR R-AND-D COSTS [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1983, 5 (03) : 195 - 211

[8] CONVENIENT SPECIFICATION TESTS FOR LOGIT AND PROBIT MODELS [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1984, 25 (03) : 241 - 262

[9] THE EFFECT OF OWNER VERSUS MANAGEMENT CONTROL ON THE CHOICE OF ACCOUNTING METHODS [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 1982, 4 (01) : 41 - 53

[10] DOPUCH N, 1987, ACCOUNT REV JUL, P431