RANDOMIZED PHASE I/II TRIAL OF 2 VARIANTS OF ACCELERATED FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY REGIMENS FOR ADVANCED HEAD AND NECK-CANCER - RESULTS OF RTOG-88-09

被引:51
作者
FU, KK
CLERY, M
ANG, KK
BYHARDT, RW
MAOR, MH
BEITLER, JJ
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,MD ANDERSON CANC CTR,HOUSTON,TX
[2] RADIAT THERAPY ONCOL GRP,STAT UNIT,PHILADELPHIA,PA
[3] MED COLL WISCONSIN,MILWAUKEE,WI 53226
[4] MONTEFIORE MED CTR,BRONX,NY 10467
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 1995年 / 32卷 / 03期
关键词
HEAD AND NECK CANCER; ACCELERATED FRACTIONATION; SPLIT COURSE; CONCOMITANT BOOST;
D O I
10.1016/0360-3016(95)00078-D
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To establish the feasibility of performing split-course accelerated hyperfractionation (AHFX-S) and concomitant boost accelerated fractionation radiotherapy (AFX-C) for advanced head and neck cancer in a multi-institutional cooperative trial setting and to evaluate the tumor clearance rate and acute and late toxicity of these fractionation schedules. Methods and Materials: Between February 1989 and January 1990, 75 patients with Stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomized to receive: (a) AHFX-S: 1.6 Gy/fraction, twice daily (6-h interval), 5 days/week, to a total dose of 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks, with a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; or (b) AFX-C: 1.8 Gy/fraction/day, 5 daily fractions/week to 54 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks to a large field and 1.5 Gy/fraction/day to a boost field, 6 h after large field treatment;during the last 11 treatment days, to a total dose of 70.5 Gy/41 fractions/6 weeks. Acute and late toxicities were scored according to the RTOG normal tissue reaction scales and tumor clearance was evaluated at completion of therapy and at regular intervals thereafter. Results: Of the 70 analyzable patients, 38 received AHFX-S and 32 received AFX-C. The two arms were balanced with respect to sex, age, T-stage, and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS). However, the AHFX-S arm had a higher proportion of oropharyngeal primaries (63% vs. 44%), and Stage IV disease (82% vs. 50%) and lower proportion of oral cavity lesions (3% vs. 22%) and N0 disease (16% vs. 31%) than the AFX-C arm. The median follow-up was 2 years (range: 0.03-4.87 years). Tolerance of both variants of accelerated fractionated radiotherapy was satisfactory. There was no significant difference in local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival between the two arms. The 2-year local-regional failure rate, survival, and disease-free survival was 50, 50, and 40%, respectively, for the entire group of patients. Acute radiation mucositis was increased in both arms. There was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3 acute toxicities (63% vs. 56%) and grade 3 (14% vs. 14%) or grade 4 (6% vs. 17%) late toxicities. Permanent grade 4 late toxicity was observed in 6 and 7% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Results of this randomized Phase I/II trial showed that the two accelerated fractionated schedules studied can be successfully given in a multi-institutional cooperative trial. There was no significant difference in acute or late toxicities, local-regional control, disease-free survival, or survival in this small scale study. Therefore, a Phase III trial comparing the relative efficacy of these two accelerated fractionation schedules against standard fractionation and hyperfractionation has been activated.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 597
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Ang, Peters, Altered fractionation in radiation oncology, Principles Pract. Oncol. Updates, 8, 4, pp. 1-15, (1994)
[2]  
Ang, Peters, Weber, Maor, Morrison, Wendt, Brown, Concomitant boost radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of carcinoma of the oropharynx and nasopharynx, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 19, pp. 1339-1345, (1990)
[3]  
Caplan, Pajak, Cox, Analysis of the probability and risk of cause-specific failure, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 5, pp. 1183-1186, (1994)
[4]  
Cox, Pajak, Marcial, Coia, Mohiuddin, Fu, Selim, Rubin, Ortiz, ASTRO Plenary: Interfraction interval is a major determinant of late effects, with hyperfractionated radiation therapy of carcinomas of upper respiratory and digestive tracts: Results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 83-13, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 20, pp. 1191-1195, (1991)
[5]  
Cox, Pajak, Marcial, Hanks, Mohiuddin, Fu, Byhardt, Rubin, Dose-response for local control with hyperfractionated radiation therapy in advanced carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tracts: Preliminary report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 83-13, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 18, pp. 515-521, (1990)
[6]  
Daly, Dental care in the irradiated patient, Textbook of radiotherapy, pp. 229-236, (1980)
[7]  
Datta, Choudhry, Gupta, Twice a day vs once a day radiation therapy in head and neck cancer, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 17, (1989)
[8]  
Fazekas, Pajak, Wasserman, Marcial, Davis, Kramer, Rotman, Stetz, Failure of misonidazole-sensitized radiation therapy to impact upon outcome among stage III–IV squamous cancers of the head and neck, Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 13, pp. 1155-1160, (1987)
[9]  
Harari, Adding dose escalation to accelerated hyperfractionation for head and neck cancer: 76 Gy in 5 weeks, Semin. Radiat. Oncol., 2, pp. 58-61, (1992)
[10]  
Horiot, Le-Fur, Nguyen, Chenal, Schraub, Alfonsi, Gardani, Van Den Bogaert, Danczak, Bolla, Van Glabbeke, De Pauw, Hyperfractionation vs. conventional fractionation in oropharyngeal carcinoma: Final analysis of a randomized trial of the EORTC cooperative group of radiotherapy, Radiother. Oncol., 25, 4, pp. 231-241, (1992)