EXCHANGEABLE AND NONEXCHANGEABLE PHOSPHATE SORPTION IN PORTUGUESE SOILS

被引:13
作者
FERNANDES, MLV
WARREN, GP
机构
[1] Secção Autónoma de Química Agrícola, Instituto Superior de Agronomia, Lisboa Codex
[2] Department of Soil Science, University of Reading, Reading, RG1 5AQ, London Road
来源
FERTILIZER RESEARCH | 1994年 / 37卷 / 01期
关键词
ALUMINUM; FREUNDLICH EQUATION; IRON; LANGMUIR EQUATION; P-32; P-SORPTION CAPACITY; TEMKIN EQUATION;
D O I
10.1007/BF00750670
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Total amounts of phosphate (P) sorbed were measured for 6 Portuguese soils of widely varying properties. P-32 was used to assess the isotopically exchangeable and non-exchangeable sorbed P. Total sorbed and exchangeable P were described by modified Freundlich equations and non-exchangeable P by a Temkin equation. The Langmuir equation also proved to fit the data for non-exchangeable P well. The amount of total sorbed P required to attain 0.2 mg P l-1 in solution ranged from 5.3 to 819 mg P kg-1. At this concentration exchangeable and non-exchangeable P values varied from 62.4 to 536.6 and from 0.4 to 322.1 mg P kg-1 respectively. There were highly significant (p < 0.01) correlations between soil organic matter and all forms of sorbed P (total sorbed, exchangeable and non-exchangeable). The P sorption parameters with correlation coefficients greater than 0.967 were parameters a and b of the modified Freundlich equation b(n) of Temkin and parameters a of the Langmuir equation. Aluminium extracted by acid oxalate (Al(OX)) and dithionite (Al(di)) showed highly significant correlation coefficients (r = 0.972) with the same sorption parameters. But P sorption was not closely related to the clay content Fe(OX) and Fe(di). It was concluded that extractable aluminium (Al(OX) and Al(di)) had the most important effects on P sorption in these soils.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 34
页数:12
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Bache B.W., Willia E.G., A phosphate sorption index for soils, Journal of Soil Science, 22, pp. 289-331, (1971)
[2]  
Beckwith R.S., Sorbed phosphate at standard supernatant concentration as an estimate of the phosphate needs of soils, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 5, pp. 52-58, (1965)
[3]  
Bray R.H., Kurtz L.T., Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soil, Soil Science, 59, pp. 39-45, (1945)
[4]  
Day P.R., Particle-size analysis, Methods of soil analysis. Part 1 Physical and mineralogical properties series, Agronomy 9:545–567, (1965)
[5]  
Fassebender H.W., Estudio del fósforo en suelos de America Central IV. Capacidade de fijación de fósforo y su relación con caracteristicas edáficas, Turrialba, 19, pp. 497-505, (1969)
[6]  
Fox R.L., Chemistry and management of soils dominated by amorphous colloids, Soil Crop Sci Florida, Proc, 33, pp. 112-119, (1974)
[7]  
Fox R.L., Kamprath E.J., Phosphate sorption isotherms for evaluating the phosphate requirements of soils, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 34, pp. 902-907, (1970)
[8]  
Fox R.L., Kang B.T., Influence of phosphorus fertilizer placement and fertilization rate on maize nutrition, Soil Science, 125, pp. 34-40, (1978)
[9]  
Fox R.L., Nishimoto R.K., Thompson J.R., De La Pena R.S., Comparative external phosphorus requirement of plants growing in tropical soils, Transactions of the 10th International Congress of Soil Sci, Moscow, 4, pp. 232-239, (1974)
[10]  
Harter R.D., Phosphorus adsorption sites in soils, Soil Science Society of America Journal, 33, pp. 630-632, (1969)