COMPARISON OF RADIOVISIOGRAPHY WITH RADIOGRAPHIC FILM IN ROOT LENGTH DETERMINATION

被引:24
作者
ONG, EY [1 ]
FORD, TRP [1 ]
机构
[1] UNITED MED & DENT SCH,GUYS HOSP,DEPT CONSERVAT DENT SURG,LONDON SE1 9RT,ENGLAND
关键词
LENGTH DETERMINATION; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOVISIOGRAPHY; X-RAY FILM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2591.1995.tb00152.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Radiovisiography is a digital intraoral radiographic imaging system requiring a substantial reduction of radiation dosage to the patient over film. For Radiovisiography to replace film, it must be shown to be as efficacious. In this study, a technique of obtaining Radiovisiography and D-speed film images from the same Xray beam was developed with the use of rare-earth filters. The quality of the resultant radiovisiographic images was verified in vitro with pure radiovisiographic images of teeth in a dried mandible with soft tissue simulation Two examiners compared Radiovisiography with D-speed film for 20 root length estimations using the same in-vitro model. A clinical study was then carried out on mandibular molars of patients undergoing endodontic treatment, where 35 root lengths were obtained. The results of both in vitro and clinical studies showed no statistical differences in the estimated root lengths using the two imaging systems. The measuring grid available in the Radiovisiography unit produced similarly accurate results. Furthermore, the clinical study demonstrated the effective use of Radiovisiography during root canal treatment, with instant images.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / 29
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Araki K, Kanda S, Radiological characteriscs of lead foils in dental film packets: analysis of components and shielding effect, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 21, pp. 21-25, (1992)
[2]  
Benz C, Mouyen F, Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 72, pp. 627-631, (1991)
[3]  
Frommer HH, Jain RK, A comparative clinical study of group D and E dental film, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine and Oral Pathology, 63, pp. 738-742, (1987)
[4]  
Gibbs SJ, Pujol A, Chen TS, James A, Patient risk from intraoral radiography, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 17, pp. 15-23, (1988)
[5]  
Griffiths BM, Brown JE, Hyatt AT, Linney AD, Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length, International Endodontic Journal, 25, pp. 279-287, (1992)
[6]  
Hembrough JH, Weine FS, Pisano JV, Eskoz N, Accuracy of an electronic apex locator: a clinical evaluation in maxillary molars, Journal of Endodontics, 19, pp. 242-246, (1993)
[7]  
Horner K, Shearer AC, Walker A, Wilson NHF, Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation, British Dental Journal, 168, pp. 244-248, (1990)
[8]  
Kantor ML, Zeichner SJ, Valachovic RW, Reiskin AB, Efficacy of dental radiographic practices: options for image receptors, examination selection, and patient selection, Journal of the American Dental Association, 119, pp. 259-268, (1989)
[9]  
Kapa SF, Tyndall DA, Ouellette TE, The application of added beam filtration to intraoral radiography, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 19, pp. 67-74, (1990)
[10]  
MCDonnel D, Price C, Effects of additional filtration on image quality in dental radiography. comparison of niobium with aluminium, Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 21, pp. 73-76, (1992)