QUALITY OF RESEARCH MEASURED BY CITATION METHOD AND BY PEER-REVIEW - A COMPARISON

被引：16

作者：

WALLMARK, JT

SEDIG, KG

机构：

[1] Chalmers Univ of Technology,, Innovation Cent, Goteborg, Swed, Chalmers Univ of Technology, Innovation Cent, Goteborg, Swed

来源：

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT | 1986年 / 33卷 / 04期

关键词：

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION - Publishing;

D O I：

10.1109/TEM.1986.6447682

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

A comparison has been performed between two methods of evaluating the quality of research as applied to seven areas of research in Sweden. The first method is that of peer review performed by specially appointed international experts; the other method is citation analysis. The comparison indicates a very considerable difference in cost between the two methods, the citation method being about 200 times less costly in terms of money as well as time. The citation method measures only one parameter of the quality of research, that of international visibility, and has a rank correlation coefficient of about 0. 6 compared to peer review.

引用

页码：218 / 222

页数：5

共 11 条

[1]

GARFIELD E, 1979, CITATION INDEXING

[2]

NARIN F, 1976, PB252339

[3] PEER REVIEW - QUALITY-CONTROL OF APPLIED SOCIAL-RESEARCH [J].

NOBLE, JH .

SCIENCE, 1974, 185 (4155) :916-921

[4] INCREASE IN EFFICIENCY WITH SIZE OF RESEARCH TEAMS [J].

WALLMARK, JT ;

ECKERSTEIN, S ;

LANGERED, B ;

HOLMQVIST, HE .

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 1973, EM20 (03) :80-86

[5]

1982, 295 STU INF VIS COMM

[6]

1982, 308 STU INF VIS COMM

[7]

1981, 243 STU INF VIS COMM

[8]

1981, 200 STU INF VIS COMM

[9]

1981, 263 STU INF VIS COMM

[10]

1981, 264 STU INF VIS COMM

← 1 2 →