A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY, TERFENADINE TABLETS AND PLACEBO IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS TO GRASS-POLLEN

被引:32
作者
DARNELL, R
PECOUD, A
RICHARDS, DH
机构
[1] GLAXO RES & DEV LTD,PROD STRATEGY GRP,UXBRIDGE UB11 1BT,MIDDX,ENGLAND
[2] MIDLANDS ASTHMA & ALLERGY RES ASSOC,DERBY,ENGLAND
[3] CHU VAUDOIS,MED POLICLIN,CH-1011 LAUSANNE,SWITZERLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb03320.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Fluticasone Propionate Aqueous Nasal Spray (FPANS) contains a topically active glucocorticoid fluticasone propionate which has been used successfully for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis. This multicentre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of FPANS with terfenadine tablets or placebo in controlling the symptoms of allergic rhinitis to grass pollen. Two hundred and fourteen patients were treated for 6 weeks during the grass pollen season with either FPANS 200 mu g once daily, terfenadine tablets (60 mg) twice daily or placebo. Efficacy was evaluated by the analysis of symptom-free days and median symptom scores. Patients receiving FPANS had significantly more days free of nasal blockage on waking (P = 0.012) and during the day (P = 0.01) and of rhinorrhoea (P = 0.027) than those receiving terfenadine. Additionally, in terms of absolute efficacy, patients receiving FPANS demonstrated significantly more days free of the above symptoms (P = 0.017, P = 0.028, P = 0.004, respectively) and of sneezing (P < 0.001) than those receiving placebo. There were no significant differences in symptoms of nasal itching, eye symptoms, of symptoms of drowsiness between the three treatment groups. Patients in the FPANS group had significantly lower median symptom scores for nasal blockage on waking (P < 0.001) and during the day (P < 0.018) than those in the terfenadine group and significantly lower scores for nasal blockage on waking (P < 0.001), sneezing (P < 0.013) and rhinorrhoea (P = 0.005) than those in the placebo group. The use of rescue medication was similar in all three treatment groups. Adverse events were similar in nature and frequency in all three treatment groups, most were mild and considered by the investigator at each centre unlikely to be related or unrelated to the study treatment. There were very few clinically significant laboratory abnormalities observed in any group. It is concluded that FPANS (200 mu g once daily) is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis and is significantly more effective than terfenadine (60 mg twice daily) in controlling nasal blockage at all times of the day and rhinorrhoea.
引用
收藏
页码:1144 / 1150
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
BRYSON HM, 1992, DRUGS, V42, P760
[2]  
BUCKLEY CE, 1988, ANN ALLERGY, V60, P123
[3]  
DOCKHORN R J, 1990, Annals of Allergy, V64, P77
[4]   FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE - A LARGE MULTICENTER TRIAL [J].
DOLOVICH, J ;
ANDERSON, M ;
CHODIRKER, W ;
DROUIN, M ;
HARGREAVE, FE ;
HEBERT, J ;
KNIGHT, A ;
OCONNER, M ;
SMALL, P ;
YANG, W .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1990, 84 :31-32
[5]  
HARDING S M, 1988, European Respiratory Journal, V1, p196S
[6]   THE HUMAN PHARMACOLOGY OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE [J].
HARDING, SM .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1990, 84 :25-29
[7]  
KAPP JF, 1984, RHINITIS, P108
[8]  
KOCK GG, 1988, BIOPHARMACEUTICAL ST, P403
[9]  
LEHMANN E, 1975, NONPARAMETRICS STATI, V81, P132
[10]   A DOSE-RANGING STUDY OF FLUTICASONE PROPIONATE AQUEOUS NASAL SPRAY FOR SEASONAL ALLERGIC RHINITIS ASSESSED BY SYMPTOMS, RHINOMANOMETRY, AND NASAL CYTOLOGY [J].
MELTZER, EO ;
ORGEL, HA ;
BRONSKY, EA ;
FURUKAWA, CT ;
GROSSMAN, J ;
LAFORCE, CF ;
LEMANSKE, RF ;
PAULL, BD ;
PEARLMAN, DS ;
RATNER, PH ;
SPECTOR, SL ;
TINKELMAN, DG ;
VANAS, A ;
ROGENES, PR .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 86 (02) :221-230