FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS OF PERFORMANCE

被引:25
作者
MALONEY, WF
机构
[1] Dept. of Civ. Engrg., The Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
来源
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE | 1990年 / 116卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1990)116:3(399)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The construction process involves the interaction of equipment, manpower, and material. Each construction project begins with performance goals for cost, schedule, safety, etc. When actual performance differs from exected performance, the cause of the deviation must be determined. The analysis of construction performance has typically been performed in a shotgun fashion. The paper presents a framework for the rationalization of the analysis of construction performance that will improve the effectiveness and efficiency of the analysis. The framework provides a decision tree that will guide construction engineers as they analyze performance. Five major issues are addressed in the framework: adequacy of actual performance; presence of organizationally imposed constraints; worker possession of required knowledge, skills, and ability; worker possession of necessary motivation; and whether the estimate is realistic. Use of the framework requires answering a series of questions. Data are suggested to allow the questions to be answered. © ASCE.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 415
页数:17
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
Alderfer C.P., Existence, Relatedness, and Growth, (1972)
[2]  
Maloney W.F., Productivity improvement: The influence of labor, J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, 109, 3, pp. 321-334, (1983)
[3]  
Maloney W.F., McFillen J.M., Research heeds in construction worker performance, J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt, 109, 2, pp. 245-254, (1983)
[4]  
Maloney W.F., McFillen J.M., Motivation in unionized construction, J. Constr. Engrg., and Mgmt, 112, 1, pp. 122-136, (1986)
[5]  
Sink D., Productivity Management: Planning, Measurement and Evaluation, Control and Improvement, (1985)
[6]  
Thomas H.R., Construction Work Sampling, (1981)
[7]  
Thomas H.R., Kramer D.F., The Manual of Construction Productivity and Measurement, (1989)
[8]  
Tucker R.L., Et al., Implementation of foreman delay surveys, J. Constr. Div, 108, 4, pp. 577-591, (1982)