A COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL CULTURE AND 3 RAPID METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF SALMONELLA IN POULTRY FEEDS AND ENVIRONMENTAL-SAMPLES

被引：22

作者：

QUINN, C

WARD, J

GRIFFIN, M

YEARSLEY, D

EGAN, J

机构：

[1] VET RES LAB,DUBLIN 15,IRELAND

[2] DUBLIN INST TECHNOL,DUBLIN,IRELAND

来源：

LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY | 1995年 / 20卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1472-765X.1995.tb01293.x

中图分类号：

Q81 [生物工程学（生物技术）]; Q93 [微生物学];

学科分类号：

071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;

摘要：

Three rapid methods, an impedance method (Malthus 2000 Analyzer), a colorimetric DNA hybridization method (Gene-Trak) and a post-enrichment enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Salmonella-Tek) were compared with conventional culture for the detection of Salmonella in poultry feeds, and in fluff and dust samples from poultry housing. The percentage positive samples for Salmonella by each of the methods were 25.5% for conventional culture, 38.4% for the Malthus, 28.9% for the Gene-Trak and 28.5% for the Salmonella-Tek. By any method 60/153 (39.2%) of the samples tested were positive on confirmed culture.

引用

页码：89 / 91

页数：3

共 5 条

[1] A COMPARISON OF AN ENZYME-IMMUNOASSAY, DNA HYBRIDIZATION, ANTIBODY IMMOBILIZATION, AND CONVENTIONAL METHODS FOR RECOVERY OF NATURALLY-OCCURRING SALMONELLAE FROM PROCESSED BROILER CARCASSES [J].