MR-IMAGING AND VASCULAR ACCESS PORTS - EX-VIVO EVALUATION OF FERROMAGNETISM, HEATING, AND ARTIFACTS AT 1.5 T

被引:16
作者
SHELLOCK, FG
NOGUEIRA, M
MORISOLI, S
机构
[1] Future Magnostlcs. Inc., Los Angeles, California, 90048
[2] Ucla, Department of Physlologlcal Sclences, Las Angeles, California
[3] Department of Radlologlc Sclences, Ucla School of Medlclne, Los Angeles, California
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1995年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
MR IMAGING; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880050421
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
The purpose of our study was to assess ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts associated with vascular access ports exposed to a 1.5-T MR system. Twenty-eight different vascular access ports were evaluated in this investigation. Ferromagnetism was determined by using two previously described techniques. Temperature changes were measured immediately before and after performing a pulse sequence on the vascular access ports for 60 min at a specific absorption rate of 3.1 W/kg. Artifacts were assessed in association with the use of a fast GRASS pulse sequence. None of the vascular access ports displayed ferromagnetism. Heating was 0.2 degrees C or less. The presence of artifacts varied, depending on the component materials. The lack of ferromagnetism and negligible heating indicates that MR imaging performed at 1.5 T or less may be conducted safely in patients with any of the vascular access ports tested. None of the associated artifacts produced by the vascular access ports is considered to pose a substantial problem for MR imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 484
页数:4
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Shellock FG, Kanal E, Magnetlc resonance: bloeffects. safety. and patient management, (1994)
[2]
Shellock FG, Schatz CJ, Metalllc otologlc Implants: in vltro assessment of ferromagnetlsm at 1.5 T, AJNR, 12, pp. 279-281, (1991)
[3]
Shellock FG, Crues JV, Hlgh‐field strength MR lmaging and metalllc blomedlcal Implants: an ex avo evaluation of deflection forces, AJR, 151, pp. 389-392, (1988)
[4]
Shellock FG, Kanal E, Safety conslderatlons of cardlovascular magnetic resonance studies, Cardlovascular appllcatlons of magnetic resonance, pp. 429-445
[5]
New PFJ, Rosen BR, Brady TJ, Et al., Potentlal hazards and artlfacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetlc surglcal and dental materlals and devices In nuclear magnetlc resonance Imaging, Radlology, 147, pp. 139-148, (1983)
[6]
Shellock FG, Morlsoll SM, Kanal E, MR procedures and biomedical Implants. materlals. and devices: 1993 update, Radiology, 189, pp. 587-599, (1993)
[7]
Buchll, Meler D, Heating effects of metallic Implants by MRI examtnatlons, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 7, pp. 255-261, (1988)
[8]
Davis PL, Crooks L, Arakawa M, Et al., Potentlal hazards In NMR Imaging: heating effects of changhg magnetlc fields and RF fields on small metalllc Implants, AJR, 137, pp. 857-860, (1981)
[9]
Shellock FG, Crues JV, Hlgh‐field MR Imaging of metalllc blomedlcal Implants: an in vitro evaluatlon of deflection forces and temperature changes induced In large prostheses, Radlology, 165, (1987)
[10]
Shellock FG, Morlsoll M, Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetlsm and artifacts of cardlac occluders exposed to a 1.5 T‐ MR system, J Magn Reson Imaging, 4, pp. 213-215, (1994)