Concerns about proarrhythmia risk and inefficacy associated with class I antiarrhythmic drugs have revived interest in low-dose amiodarone (maintenance dose 200-400 mg/day) for suppression of atrial fibrillation. In nonrandomized trails of amiodarone for atrial fibrillation refractory to conventional agents, amiodarone has been successful in maintaining sinus rhythm in 53-79% of patients during a mean follow-up of 15-27 months. Intolerable side effects, including pulmonary toxicity, are in the range of 1-12% per year and resolve following amiodarone withdrawal in the majority of cases. Proarrhythmia risk associated with amiodarone, even in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction, is extremely low. In patients with congestive heart failure, in whom other pharmacologic options are limited by proarrhythmia risk and negative inotropism, preliminary experience with amiodarone is especially promising. Randomized trials are needed, directly comparing amiodarone to conventional antiarrhythmic therapy for atrial fibrillation suppression and comparing amiodarone to warfarin for thromboembolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic drugs.