COMPUTERIZED PHOTOPLETHYSMOGRAPHY OF THE FINGER

A microcomputer system for studying photo-plethysmography of the finger (PPF) was designed and applied to 50 non-premedicated healthy boys (one to ten years old) undergoing general anaesthesia (halothane in 70% N2O, with mechanical ventilation) for outpatient inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of computerized estimations of the photo-plethysmographic (arterial waves) amplitude and to evaluate whether or not PPF allows discrimination between two different surgical stimuli (skin incision, and manipulation of the spermatic cord). When anaesthesia was stable for at least five minutes (end-tidal halothane = 1.25-1.5%; PETCO2 = 32-38 mmHg, SpO2 greater-than-or-equal-to 98%; rectal temperature = 36.3-37-degrees-C; ambient operating room temperature = 20-21-degrees-C), and immediately before the skin incision, computerized estimations of the photo-plethysmographic (arterial waves) amplitudes (PPA) were recorded and saved for later comparison with direct (manual) measurements of the plethysmographic tracing, using an arbitrary scale of 0-255 units. Also, the values of PPA, systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate recorded immediately before the skin incision were later compared with the maximum changes in these same values recorded 30-90 sec after skin incision, and 30-90 sec after manipulation (traction + dissection) of the spermatic cord. Six boys (three to ten years old) stayed quiet enough, during induction of anaesthesia by mask, to allow regression analysis of PPA, systolic blood pressure, and pulse rate (Y) on end-tidal halothane/70% N2O (X). Computerized estimations tended to give a higher reading, by between 0.2 to 0.8 units, than direct measurements. Spearman and Kendall correlations showed that computerized and direct measurements were associated (P < 0.0001), the Kolmogorov-Smirnov's test revealed that the two distributions were identical (P = 1), the mean difference between computerized and direct estimations of the PPA was 0.52 +/- 1.08 units, and the limits of agreement (-1.6 and 2.6 units) were small enough to be confident that computerized (automatic) estimations of PPA can be used for clinical purposes. Skin incision caused a smaller decrease of PPA (24%) than manipulation of the spermatic cord (37%). Changes in PPA were more pronounced than changes in systolic blood pressure or pulse rate (P < 0.05). Linear regressions and Fisher's exact test (two-tailed) showed that, during induction of anaesthesia with halothane in 70% N2O by mask (n = 6), changes in end-tidal halothane concentration were related more to changes in PPA than to changes in systolic blood pressure and/or in pulse rate (P < 0.05). In conclusion, computerized PPF allows discrimination between two different surgical stimuli provides quantification of the sympathetic response to preoperative anxiety, and may be useful for studying pre-anaesthetic sedation.