Fairness in interorganizational project relations: norms and strategies

被引:36
作者
Kadefors, Anna [1 ]
机构
[1] Chalmers Univ Technol, Dept Technol Management & Econ, SE-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
Construction contracts; conflict; procurement; fairness; winner's curse;
D O I
10.1080/01446190500184238
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
There is a strong preference for fairness in human interaction, so that people who experience unfairness tend to react with anger, resentment and loss of motivation. Concerns to appear fair influence the behaviour of both individuals and firms. Perceptions of fairness are susceptible to framing and may be influenced by various norms for outcome distribution as well as by decision processes and interpersonal relations. This paper deals with causes and effects of fairness perceptions in construction project relations, mainly fixed price contracts procured by competitive tendering. In such projects, uncertainty results in continuous post contract award problem-solving and negotiations, and fairness concerns may have incremental but significant influence on the terms of exchange. Case studies of client-contractor interaction in two projects are used to discuss of how fairness norms relate to strategies and industry culture. It is concluded that that an intuitive cost-based norm of fair pricing shapes interaction in construction projects, but that consequences vary between projects. The norm may favour contractors, but is also related to poor risk management and client distrust. To improve performance, clients need to design procurement practices and communication so that perceptions of contractor losses are counteracted.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 878
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ADAMS JS, 1965, ADV EXP SOC PSYCHOL, V2, P267
[2]   I WON THE AUCTION BUT DONT WANT THE PRIZE [J].
BAZERMAN, MH ;
SAMUELSON, WF .
JOURNAL OF CONFLICT RESOLUTION, 1983, 27 (04) :618-634
[3]  
Bennet J., 1998, TRUSTING TEAM BEST P
[4]  
BIES RJ, 1987, RES ORGAN BEHAV, V9, P289
[5]  
Billing B., 1990, NEGOTIATING SKILLS E
[6]   An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J].
Brockner, J ;
Wiesenfeld, BM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :189-208
[7]  
Cialdini Robert B., 1993, INFLUENCE SCI PRACTI
[8]  
Cox I.D., 1999, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V17, P427, DOI [10.1080/014461999371358, DOI 10.1080/014461999371358]
[9]   The descriptive and prescriptive use of previous purchase price in negotiations [J].
Diekmann, KA ;
Tenbrunsel, AE ;
Shah, PP ;
Schroth, HA ;
Bazerman, MH .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1996, 66 (02) :179-191
[10]   Altruistic punishment in humans [J].
Fehr, E ;
Gächter, S .
NATURE, 2002, 415 (6868) :137-140