EFFICACY OF BULB VERSUS DELEE SUCTION AT DELIVERIES COMPLICATED BY MECONIUM-STAINED AMNIOTIC-FLUID

被引:12
作者
LOCUS, P
YEOMANS, E
CROSBY, U
机构
[1] St. Paul Medical Center at Dallas, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-999454
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
A combined obstetric-pediatric approach to the management of deliveries complicated by meconium-stained amniotic fluid has been recommended to decrease the incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome. Although pharyngeal suction with a DeLee catheter is generally recommended, many obstetricians prefer to use a bulb syringe for suction at the perineum. A thorough review of the literature reveals no prospective studies in humans comparing the two techniques. In the present study, these two techniques of pharyngeal suction were prospectively compared at deliveries complicated by meconium-stained amniotic fluid. Of the total 2874 deliveries, 127 (4%) were complicated by moderate or thickly meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and 107 of these were included in the study. There were 53 infants in the DeLee-suctioned group and 54 in the bulb-suctioned group. Of the 107 studied infants, four (4%) developed meconium aspiration syndrome, three in the DeLee group and one in the bulb group. There was no significant difference in the amount of meconium found below the vocal cords, comparing pharyngeal DeLee suction to bulb suction (0.22 cc versus 0.24 cc; p = NS). In conclusion, the data fail to support a significant difference in efficacy between bulb and DeLee suction in clearing the naso- and oropharynx of the neonate of meconium in cephalic-presenting vaginal or cesarean delivery. © 1990, by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 91
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Gregory G.A., Gooding C.A., Phibbs R.H., Tooley W.H., Meconium aspiration in infants: A prospective study, J Pediatr, 85, pp. 848-852, (1974)
[2]  
Meis P.J., Hall M., Marshell J.R., Hobel C.J., Meconium passage: A new classification for risk assessment during labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 131, pp. 509-513, (1978)
[3]  
Davis R.O., Phillips J.B., Haris B.A., Wilson E.R., Huddleston J.F., Fatal meconium aspiration syndrome occurring despite airway management considered appropriate, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 151, pp. 731-736, (1985)
[4]  
Carson B.S., Cosey R.W., Bowes W.A., Simmons M.A., Combined obstetric and pediatric approach to prevent meconium aspiration syndrome, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 126, pp. 712-715, (1976)
[5]  
Schulze M., The significance of passage of meconium during labor, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 10, pp. 83-88, (1925)
[6]  
Walker J., Foetal anoxia, J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp, 57, pp. 162-180, (1954)
[7]  
Gooding C.A., Gregory G.A., Taber P., Wright R.R., An experimental odel for the study of meconium aspiration of the newborn, Radiology, 100, pp. 137-140, (1971)
[8]  
Goodlin R.C., Suppression of fetal breathing to prevent aspiration of meconium, Obstet Gynecol, 36, pp. 944-947, (1970)
[9]  
Block M., Kollenberger D.A., Kern J.D., Nepveux R.D., In utero meconium aspiration by the baboon fetus, Obstet Gynecol, 57, (1981)
[10]  
Gage J.E., Taeusch H.W., Treves S., Caldicott W., Suctioning of upper airway meconium in newborn infants, JAMA, 246, pp. 2590-2592, (1981)