CERVICAL INTERNAL OS CERCLAGE - DESCRIPTION OF A NEW TECHNIQUE AND COMPARISON WITH SHIRODKAR OPERATION

被引:30
作者
CASPI, E
SCHNEIDER, DF
MOR, Z
LANGER, R
WEINRAUB, Z
BUKOVSKY, I
机构
[1] The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, University of Tel-Aviv, Sackler School of Medicine, Zerifin
关键词
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-999520
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Internal os cerclage for cervical incompetence was performed in 90 patients who had previous McDonald procedure failure (70 patients) or had unfavorable cervical anatomy (short or lacerated cervix) for primary McDonald type cerclage (20 patients). Two different techniques were used: the Shirodkar operation (n = 44) with Mersilene band, and a simpler new technique (n = 46). The new technique is characterized by anterior colpotomy for exposure of the internal os, and a 0.6 mm nylon suture encircling the cervix to be tied high in the posterior fornix. The pregnancy outcome for both groups was similar. Late abortions of 8.7 and 11% and premature deliveries of 13 and 18% occurred in the new technique and the Shirodkar groups, respectively. The removal of the suture was generally difficult in the Shirodkar group and in eight patients analgesia and sedation were required. In the new technique group, the removal was easier and in only one patient was sedation required (p <0.0001). Severe vaginal discharge was found in 52% of the Shirodkar patients and none in the other group. Apparently the monofilament nylon suture prevented this side effect. It seems that the new technique is simpler to perform, involves fewer side effects, the removal of the suture is easier, and it is as effective as the Shirodkar procedure. © 1990, by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 349
页数:3
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]  
Harger J.H., Comparison of success and morbidity in cervical cerclage procedures, Obstet Gynecol, 56, pp. 543-548, (1980)
[2]  
Palmer R., Lacomme M., La beance de l'orifice interne, cause d'avortement a repetition? Une observation de dechirure cervico-istmique reparee chirurgicalment avec gestation a terme consecutive, Bull Assoc Gynecol Fr, 47, pp. 905-908, (1948)
[3]  
Shirodkar V.N., In Barter R.H., Dusbabek J.A., Tyndal C.M., Erkenbeck R.V., Further experience with the Shirodkar operation, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 85, pp. 792-805, (1963)
[4]  
Shirodkar V.N., Long term results with the operative treatment of habitual abortion, Triangle, 8, pp. 123-125, (1967)
[5]  
Tatum H.J., Schmidt F.H., Phillips D., McCarty M., O'Leary W.M., The Dalkon shield controversy. Structural and bacteriological studies of IUD tails, JAMA, 231, pp. 711-717, (1975)
[6]  
Charles D., Edwards V.V.R., Infectious complication of cervical cerclage, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 141, pp. 1065-1071, (1981)