RATIONALES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF LIMITS AND REGULATIONS FOR MYCOTOXINS

被引:99
作者
STOLOFF, L [1 ]
VANEGMOND, HP [1 ]
PARKS, DL [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV ARIZONA,309 SHANTZ BLDG,TUCSON,AZ 85721
来源
FOOD ADDITIVES AND CONTAMINANTS | 1991年 / 8卷 / 02期
关键词
AFLATOXIN; DEOXYNIVALENOL; DIACETOXYSCIRPENOL; HAZARD ANALYSIS; MYCOTOXIN; OCHRATOXIN; PATULIN; REGULATION; RISK MANAGEMENT; T-2; TOXIN; TOLERANCE; ZEARALENONE;
D O I
10.1080/02652039109373971
中图分类号
O69 [应用化学];
学科分类号
081704 ;
摘要
Although 50 countries have enacted or proposed regulations for control of aflatoxins in food or feed, and 15 of these countries also have regulations for permitted levels of contamination by other mycotoxins, very few countries have formally presented the rationale for the need to regulate, or for the selection of a particular maximum tolerated level. After several successive inquiries, information concerning the rationale for regulation was obtained from 21 countries. Most of the responses concerned limits for aflatoxin in food, and most of these were based on a vague, unsupported statement of the carcinogenic risk for humans. There was a general consensus that exposure to a potential human carcinogen that could not be totally avoided should be limited to the lowest practical level; the definition of practicality depended on whether the country was an importer or producer of the potentially contaminated commodity. A claim to a hazard evaluation was made by six countries (Canada, Belgium, India, United Kingdom, United States, Switzerland) without providing specifics; and one country, South Africa, referred to a risk determination. The most comprehensive rationale for any mycotoxin regulation was provided by the United States in support of limits for aflatoxin in specific animal feedstuffs. The responses provided no rationale for setting limits for other mycotoxins; but scholarly risk assessments for zearalenone and ochratoxin A have been published by Canadian government scientists, and a symposium presentation provides the information that in Norway patulin is regulated for quality control purposes only. It is apparent that, in most countries, either the scientific basis for regulation of mycotoxins is nonexistent, or the science has not been fully utilized. For a common approach to the control of mycotoxin hazards, access to the best available scientific data, and agreement on its interpretation, now appear to be the most important initial steps.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 222
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Council Directive on the fixing of permitted levels for undesirable substances and products in feeding stuffs (74/63/EEC), Official Journal of the European Communities, L38, pp. 31-37, (1974)
  • [2] Seventh Commission Directive of 1 March 1976 establishing Community methods of analysis for the official control of feeding stuffs—Determination of aflatoxin B1, Official Journal of the European Communities, L102, pp. 8-18, (1976)
  • [3] Third Commission Directive of 28 July 1983 amending the annex to Council Directive 74/63 EEC on the fixing of maximum permitted levels for undesirable substances and products in feeding stuffs, Official Journal of the European Communities, L222, pp. 31-32, (1983)
  • [4] Aflatoxin contamination of milk: Establishment of action level, Federal Register, 42, (1977)
  • [5] Corn shipped in interstate commerce for use in animal feeds
  • [6] action levels for anatoxins in animal feeds—Revised compliance policy guide
  • [7] availability
  • [8] FDA's policy on blending of aflatoxin-contaminated corn from the 1988 harvest with noncontaminated corn for use in animal feeds, Federal Register, 54, pp. 22262-22264, (1989)
  • [9] Hsieh D.P.H., Cullen J.M., Ruebner B.H., Comparative hepatocarcinogenicity of aflatoxins B1 and M1 in the rat, Food and Chemical Toxicology, 22, pp. 1027-1028, (1984)
  • [10] Anatoxins, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Humans, pp. 83-87, (1987)